Abstract
An on-farm trial was conducted at Manamadurai in Tamil Nadu with the objective of studying the influence of slow-release fertilizer nitrogen and the effect of sprays, with simple extracts of neem products on the incidence of rice pests. Both neem. cake-coated urea and coalter-coated area significantly reduced the incidence of what maggot and leaffolder but had no significant effect on the incidence of stem borer. Green leafhopper population was lower in neem cake-coated urea while gall midge incidence was less in conltar-coated urea. Foliar application of neem seed extract at 2% and neem cake extract at 5% were ineffective in controlling major rice posts.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cake-coated urea significantly reduced what maggot and leaffolder incidence.
- Taxon
- RICE
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- neem. cake-coated ureae0
- Outcome
- incidence of what maggot and leaffoldere0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both neem. cake-coated urea and coalter-coated area significantly reduced the incidence of what maggot and leaffolder but had no significant effect on the incidence of stem borer.”
t0“RICE PESTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Coalter-coated area significantly reduced what maggot and leaffolder incidence.
- Taxon
- RICEOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- coalter-coated areae0
- Outcome
- incidence of what maggot and leaffoldere0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both neem. cake-coated urea and coalter-coated area significantly reduced the incidence of what maggot and leaffolder but had no significant effect on the incidence of stem borer.”
t0“RICE PESTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Coated urea treatments had no significant effect on stem borer incidence.
- Taxon
- RICEOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- neem. cake-coated urea and coalter-coated areae0
- Interactor
- stem borere0pest
- Outcome
- incidence of stem borere0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both neem. cake-coated urea and coalter-coated area significantly reduced the incidence of what maggot and leaffolder but had no significant effect on the incidence of stem borer.”
t0“RICE PESTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Green leafhopper population was lower with neem cake-coated urea.
- Taxon
- RICEOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- neem cake-coated ureae0
- Interactor
- Green leafhoppere0pest
- Outcome
- Green leafhopper populatione0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green leafhopper population was lower in neem cake-coated urea”
t0“RICE PESTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Gall midge incidence was lower with conltar-coated urea.
- Taxon
- RICEOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- conltar-coated ureae0
- Interactor
- gall midgee0pest
- Outcome
- gall midge incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gall midge incidence was less in conltar-coated urea.”
t0“RICE PESTS”
Claim · model-written summary
Two neem extract sprays were ineffective against major rice pests.
- Taxon
- RICEOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of neem seed extract at 2% and neem cake extract at 5%e0
- Outcome
- controlling major rice postse0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of neem seed extract at 2% and neem cake extract at 5% were ineffective in controlling major rice posts.”
t0“RICE PESTS”
The same questions in other papers
Azadirachta indica · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- no effect
application · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →botanical · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →nitrogen · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →nitrogen · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →botanical · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
82 papers more in this group
See all 86 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.