Abstract
The effects of chicken manure and different bacteria applications on yield and yield components of beans were investigated in present study. The field experiment was conducted during the 2019 and 2020 at the experimental area of the Faculty of Agriculture, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. Chicken manure (chicken manure + and chicken manure -) were main plots and bacteria applications (control; traditional; rhizobia; bontera; traditional + rhizobia; traditional + bontera; rhizobia + bontera; traditional + rhizobia + bontera) were sub-plots. All of the investigated characters were higher in second year than first year except for harvest index and hundred kernel weight due to especially June precipitation in second year. Application of chicken manure positively affected important yield components, chlorophyll content and yield. In general, the application of bacteria alone or together has positively affected yield and yield components. The highest yield was obtained from traditional+rhizobia+bontera application. Consequently; it was determined that the efficiency of bacteria increased with the application of chicken manure and positive results were obtained in yield and yield components of beans.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Most characters were higher in the second year.
Verbatim
e0“All of the investigated characters were higher in second year than first year except for harvest index and hundred kernel weight”
t0“BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure increased yield components and yield.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Application of chicken manure positively affected important yield components, chlorophyll content and yield”
t0“BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure positively affected chlorophyll content.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Application of chicken manure positively affected important yield components, chlorophyll content and yield”
t0“BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacteria application positively affected yield and yield components.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“the application of bacteria alone or together has positively affected yield and yield components”
t0“BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Traditional plus rhizobia plus bontera gave highest yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was obtained from traditional+rhizobia+bontera application”
t0“BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure increased bacterial application efficiency.
Verbatim
e0“the efficiency of bacteria increased with the application of chicken manure”
t0“BEAN”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
372 papers more in this group
See all 376 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.