Abstract
The field studies on the effect of irrigation and fertilization on production potential of wheat during 1979-80and80-81 revealed that any reduction in recommended fertilizer and irrigation levels reduced grain yield significantly. Two post-sowing irrigation given at CRI and milky stages increased mean grain yield by 10 g/ha (62.5%) over control. Two more irrigation applied at jointing and flowering stages increased 4 q/ha in mean grain yield. Mean grain yield reduced by 3.7 and 3 q ha when recommended fertilizer dose (80-60-40) was re- duced upto 66-6 and 33,3 percent respectively. Irrigation water use efficiency and nutrient response decreased with increasing levels of irrigation and fertilizer doses.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Reducing recommended fertilizer and irrigation levels significantly reduced wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- reduction in recommended fertilizer and irrigation levelse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- recommended fertilizer and irrigation levelse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“any reduction in recommended fertilizer and irrigation levels reduced grain yield significantly”
t0“wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at CRI and milky stages increased mean grain yield by 10 g/ha (62.5%) over control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Two post-sowing irrigation given at CRI and milky stagese0
- Outcome
- mean grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10 g/ha (62.5%)e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two post-sowing irrigation given at CRI and milky stages increased mean grain yield by 10 g/ha (62.5%) over control”
t0“wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
Two further irrigations at jointing and flowering increased mean grain yield by 4 q/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Two more irrigation applied at jointing and flowering stagese0
- Outcome
- mean grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 4 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two more irrigation applied at jointing and flowering stages increased 4 q/ha in mean grain yield”
t0“wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency and nutrient response decreased as irrigation and fertilizer doses increased.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- increasing levels of irrigation and fertilizer dosese0
- Outcome
- Irrigation water use efficiency and nutrient responsee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation water use efficiency and nutrient response decreased with increasing levels of irrigation and fertilizer doses”
t0“wheat Production”
The same questions in other papers
stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.