Paper · 2023 · BMC Plant Biology

Low cost maize stover biochar as an alternative to inorganic fertilizer for improvement of soil chemical properties, growth and yield of tomatoes on degraded soil of Northern Uganda

Cosmas Wacal; Daniel Basalirwa; John Byalebeka; et al.

14
claims
38
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Soil fertility decline due to nutrient mining coupled with low inorganic fertilizer usage is a major cause of low crop yields across sub-Saharan Africa. Recently, biochar potential to improve soil fertility has gained significant attention but there are limited studies on the use of biochar as an alternative to inorganic fertilizers. In this study, we determined the effect of maize stover biochar without inorganic fertilizers on soil chemical properties, growth and yield of tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum L.). A field experiment was conducted in 2022 for two consecutive seasons in Northern Uganda. The experiment included five treatments; inorganic fertilizer (control), biochar applied at rates of 3.5, 6.9, 13.8 and 27.6 t ha −1 . Results In this study, maize stover biochar improved all the soil chemical properties. Compared to the control, pH significantly increased by 27% in the 27.6 t ha −1 while total N increased by 35.6% in the 13.8 t ha −1 . Although P was significantly low in the 3.5 t ha −1 , 6.9 t ha −1 and 13.8 t ha −1 , it increased by 3.9% in the 27.6 t ha −1 . Exchangeable K was significantly increased by 42.7% and 56.7% in the 13.8 t ha −1 and 27.6 t ha −1 respectively. Exchangeable Ca and Mg were also higher in the biochar treatment than the control. Results also showed that plant height, shoot weight, and all yield parameters were significantly higher in the inorganic fertilizer treatment than in the 3.5, 6.9, and 13.8 t ha −1 treatments. Interestingly, maize stover biochar at 27. 6 t ha −1 increased fruit yield by 16.1% compared to the control suggesting it could be used as an alternative to inorganic fertilizer. Conclusions Maize stover biochar applied at 27.6 t ha −1 improved soil chemical properties especially pH, N, P and K promoting growth and yield of tomatoes. Therefore, maize stover biochar could be recommended as an alternative to expensive inorganic fertilizers for tomato production in Northern Uganda.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 27.6 t ha −1 increased soil pH by 27% relative to inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
27.6 t ha −1e0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, pH significantly increased by 27% in the 27.6 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 13.8 t ha −1 increased soil total N by 35.6%.

Treatment
13.8 t ha −1e0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.6%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total N increased by 35.6% in the 13.8 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P was significantly lower with 3.5 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
3.5 t ha −1e0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P was significantly low in the 3.5 t ha −1 , 6.9 t ha −1 and 13.8 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P was significantly lower with 6.9 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
6.9 t ha −1e0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P was significantly low in the 3.5 t ha −1 , 6.9 t ha −1 and 13.8 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P was significantly lower with 13.8 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
13.8 t ha −1e0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P was significantly low in the 3.5 t ha −1 , 6.9 t ha −1 and 13.8 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P increased by 3.9% with 27.6 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
27.6 t ha −1e0
Outcome
Pe1
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.9%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased by 3.9% in the 27.6 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although P was significantly low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1013 · show in text ↑
e2

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable K increased by 42.7% with 13.8 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
13.8 t ha −1e0
Outcome
Exchangeable Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.7%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exchangeable K was significantly increased by 42.7% and 56.7% in the 13.8 t ha −1 and 27.6 t ha −1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1221 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable K increased by 56.7% with 27.6 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
27.6 t ha −1e0
Outcome
Exchangeable Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
56.7%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exchangeable K was significantly increased by 42.7% and 56.7% in the 13.8 t ha −1 and 27.6 t ha −1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1221 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar treatments had higher exchangeable Ca and Mg than inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
biochar treatmente0
Outcome
Exchangeable Ca and Mge0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exchangeable Ca and Mg were also higher in the biochar treatment than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1304 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, shoot weight and yield parameters were higher with inorganic fertilizer than 3.5 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
plant height, shoot weight, and all yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
3.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, shoot weight, and all yield parameters were significantly higher in the inorganic fertilizer treatment than in the 3.5, 6.9, and 13.8 t ha −1 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, shoot weight and yield parameters were higher with inorganic fertilizer than 6.9 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
plant height, shoot weight, and all yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
6.9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, shoot weight, and all yield parameters were significantly higher in the inorganic fertilizer treatment than in the 3.5, 6.9, and 13.8 t ha −1 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, shoot weight and yield parameters were higher with inorganic fertilizer than 13.8 t ha −1 biochar.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
plant height, shoot weight, and all yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
13.8 t ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, shoot weight, and all yield parameters were significantly higher in the inorganic fertilizer treatment than in the 3.5, 6.9, and 13.8 t ha −1 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 27. 6 t ha −1 increased fruit yield by 16.1% over inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
maize stover biochar at 27. 6 t ha −1e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.1%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize stover biochar at 27. 6 t ha −1 increased fruit yield by 16.1% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1605 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–145 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend maize stover biochar as an alternative fertilizer for tomato production in Northern Uganda.

Outcome
maize stover biochar could be recommended as an alternative to expensive inorganic fertilizerse0
Setting
Northern Ugandae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize stover biochar could be recommended as an alternative to expensive inorganic fertilizers for tomato production in Northern Uganda.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1981 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

biochar · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

56 papers: 51 positive, 5 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.