Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the most important physiological and biological effects of green synthesis ZnO nanoparticles at a size of 65 nm, biostimulant (Folcare) and interaction biostimulant ZnO NPs on plant growth and metabolism. As our understanding of biostimulants' preventive and restorative modes of action has increased, it is critical to maintain the best crop output and quality possible. The reduction of fertilizers must be substituted by strategies that improve the nutrients uptake or their utilization by the plants. New processing methods are required as an efficient green process or an integrated (hybrid) process for different new technologies of interest. The effects of NPs, biostimulant, and combination ZnO NPs biostimulant on plant cell metabolism were examined in cytosol, chloroplast, and mitochondria of cells from the stems, roots, and leaves. The interaction NPs/biostimulant had a beneficial effect on the morphological and physiological indicators of plant health than when nanoparticles and biostimulant are applied separately. Folcare biostimulant coupled with zinc oxide nanoparticles improved pea crops growth. The improved of the quality of pea plants can be explained at least, in part, by increase in antioxidant activities during plant growth phenophase.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nanoparticles and biostimulant had a more beneficial effect on morphological and physiological indicators than either applied separately.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- NPs/biostimulante0
- Outcome
- morphological and physiological indicators of plant healthe0
- Direction
- beneficial effecte0
- Comparator
- nanoparticles and biostimulant are applied separatelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction NPs/biostimulant had a beneficial effect on the morphological and physiological indicators of plant health than when nanoparticles and biostimulant are applied separately.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Folcare with zinc oxide nanoparticles improved pea crop growth.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Folcare biostimulant coupled with zinc oxide nanoparticlese0
- Outcome
- pea crops growthe0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Folcare biostimulant coupled with zinc oxide nanoparticles improved pea crops growth.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors partly attributed improved pea quality to increased antioxidant activities during growth.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- quality of pea plantse0
- Qualifier
- increase in antioxidant activities during plant growth phenophasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The improved of the quality of pea plants can be explained at least, in part, by increase in antioxidant activities during plant growth phenophase.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc oxide nanoparticle · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
other · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.