Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

The Effect of Biostimulants on Fruit Quality of Processing Tomato Grown under Deficit Irrigation

Vasiliki Liava; Christina Chaski; Mikel Añibarro-Ortega; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water shortage can be a restrictive factor for the growth and quality of vegetable crops. Considering the alleviating effects of biostimulant application against water stress, this study aimed to investigate the effect of four biostimulant products (protein and amino acids with carboxylic acids (Tr1); protein and amino acids with seaweed extracts (Tr2); humic and fulvic acids with seaweed extracts (Tr3); SiO2 (Tr4); and control (no biostimulants added)) and two irrigation systems (regulated deficit irrigation (RDI)—65% of field capacity and regular irrigation (RI)—100% of field capacity) on quality parameters of processing tomato fruit. Regulated deficit irrigation and biostimulant application increased the energetic value, carbohydrates, and free sugars content, while organic acids showed a variable response to biostimulant use. In terms of tocopherols (α-, β-, γ-, δ-) and carotenoids (lycopene and β-carotene), regular irrigation and biostimulant application negatively affected their content, while Tr3 treatment had a beneficial impact on these lipophilic compounds under RDI conditions. The main fatty acids were palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acids, which increased when plants were treated with Tr3 and Tr1 biostimulants under a deficit regime. Antioxidant activity (assessed by TBARS and OxHLIA assays) and total phenolic and flavonoids content also showed a variable response to the studied factors. In particular, the application of Tr3 and the control treatment under RDI increased the total phenolic content, while the control and Tr3 treatments under the same irrigation regime recorded the highest antioxidant activity. In conclusion, our results indicate that the adoption of eco-friendly strategies such as regulated deficit irrigation and biostimulant application can beneficially affect the quality traits of processing tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation and biostimulants increased energetic value, carbohydrates and free sugars.

Treatment
Regulated deficit irrigation and biostimulant applicatione0
Outcome
energetic value, carbohydrates, and free sugars contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regulated deficit irrigation and biostimulant application increased the energetic value, carbohydrates, and free sugars content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic acids responded variably to biostimulants.

Treatment
biostimulant usee0
Outcome
organic acidse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic acids showed a variable response to biostimulant use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regular irrigation and biostimulants lowered tocopherol and carotenoid content.

Treatment
regular irrigation and biostimulant applicatione0
Outcome
tocopherols (α-, β-, γ-, δ-) and carotenoids (lycopene and β-carotene)e1
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regular irrigation and biostimulant application negatively affected their content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“tocopherols (α-, β-, γ-, δ-) and carotenoids (lycopene and β-carotene)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tr3 improved lipophilic compounds under RDI.

Treatment
Tr3 treatmente0
Outcome
lipophilic compoundse0
Direction
beneficial impacte0
Qualifier
under RDI conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tr3 treatment had a beneficial impact on these lipophilic compounds under RDI conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmitic and linoleic acids increased with Tr3 under deficit irrigation.

Treatment
Tr3e0
Outcome
palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main fatty acids were palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acids, which increased when plants were treated with Tr3 and Tr1 biostimulants under a deficit regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmitic and linoleic acids increased with Tr1 under deficit irrigation.

Treatment
Tr1e0
Outcome
palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main fatty acids were palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acids, which increased when plants were treated with Tr3 and Tr1 biostimulants under a deficit regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tr3 under RDI increased total phenolic content.

Treatment
Tr3e0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of Tr3 and the control treatment under RDI increased the total phenolic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control under RDI increased total phenolic content.

Treatment
control treatment under RDIe0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of Tr3 and the control treatment under RDI increased the total phenolic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control under RDI had the highest antioxidant activity.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control and Tr3 treatments under the same irrigation regime recorded the highest antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tr3 under RDI had the highest antioxidant activity.

Treatment
Tr3e0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control and Tr3 treatments under the same irrigation regime recorded the highest antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑

other · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 46 positive, 17 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.