Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Enhancing Tomato Growth and Quality Under Deficit Irrigation with Silicon Application

Mikel Añibarro-Ortega; Alexis Pereira; José Pinela; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two irrigation systems (deficit irrigation (DI)—70% of field capacity—and full irrigation (FI)—100% of field capacity) and a biostimulant formulation (silicon (Si) and calcium (Ca) at four different rates) on the chemical composition and fruit quality of greenhouse-grown tomatoes. Deficit irrigation and biostimulant application influenced the proximate composition of tomato fruits. Fructose and glucose were the main soluble sugars, while malic and citric acids were the predominant organic acids. Free sugar and organic acid content increased under DI and biostimulant applications. In contrast, deficit irrigation combined with biostimulant application decreased α-tocopherol levels. In terms of carotenoids, lycopene and β-carotene concentrations were higher under full irrigation. The main fatty acids were palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acids, with saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids being the main classes. Moreover, biostimulant applications reduced the total phenolic content regardless of the irrigation regime, whereas the flavonoid content increased when biostimulants were applied under FI conditions. Regarding antioxidant activity (assessed by TBARS and OxHLIA assays), a variable response to irrigation and biostimulant application was observed. In conclusion, the application of Si and Ca under DI showed promising results in terms of yield and quality of tomato fruit and it could be considered a sustainable strategy to mitigate adverse effects of climate change on horticultural crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructose and glucose were the main soluble sugars in tomato fruit.

Outcome
Fructose and glucose were the main soluble sugarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fructose and glucose were the main soluble sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malic and citric acids were the predominant organic acids in tomato fruit.

Outcome
malic and citric acids were the predominant organic acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“malic and citric acids were the predominant organic acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation increased free sugar and organic acid content in tomato fruit.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
Free sugar and organic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Free sugar and organic acid content increased under DI and biostimulant applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant applications increased free sugar and organic acid content in tomato fruit.

Treatment
biostimulant applicationse0
Outcome
Free sugar and organic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Free sugar and organic acid content increased under DI and biostimulant applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation with biostimulant application decreased tomato fruit α-tocopherol levels.

Treatment
deficit irrigation combined with biostimulant applicatione0
Outcome
α-tocopherol levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation combined with biostimulant application decreased α-tocopherol levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene and β-carotene concentrations were higher under full irrigation.

Treatment
full irrigatione0
Outcome
lycopene and β-carotene concentrationse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lycopene and β-carotene concentrations were higher under full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmitic and linoleic acids were the main fatty acids of tomato fruit.

Outcome
palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main fatty acids were palmitic (C16:0) and linoleic (C18:2n6) acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids were the main fatty acid classes.

Outcome
saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“saturated (SFA) and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids being the main classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants reduced total phenolic content regardless of irrigation regime.

Treatment
biostimulant applicationse0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
regardless of the irrigation regimee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biostimulant applications reduced the total phenolic content regardless of the irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants increased flavonoid content under full irrigation.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
flavonoid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
FI conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flavonoid content increased when biostimulants were applied under FI conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity varied in response to irrigation and biostimulant application.

Outcome
antioxidant activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant activity (assessed by TBARS and OxHLIA assays), a variable response to irrigation and biostimulant application was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered Si and Ca under deficit irrigation promising for tomato yield and fruit quality.

Treatment
application of Si and Ca under DIe0
Outcome
yield and quality of tomato fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of Si and Ca under DI showed promising results in terms of yield and quality of tomato fruit and it could be considered a sustainable strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

other · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 33 positive, 18 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.