Abstract
The low productivity of groundnut, pigeonpea and castor is mainly due to its cultivation in rainfed production system associated with prolonged dryspells during critical stages of crop growth period. A field experiment was conducted during kharif of 2015 to 2021 in rainfed alfisols with different in-situ and ex-situ moisture conservation techniques for groundnut, pigeonpea and castor at AICRPDA, Ananthapuramu, ANGRAU, Andhra Pradesh. In castor and pigeonpea, integration of in-situ conservation furrows and mulching recorded higher seed yield compared to rainfed crop without moisture conservation. In pigeonpea, the mean data of three years indicated that, conservation furrows in each row followed by sub soiling at one meter distance and shell mulching gave higher seed yield compared to rainfed crop without moisture conservation. In castor, mean data of three years indicated that sub soiling at one meter distance followed by conservation furrows in each row and shell mulching gave higher seed yield of 892 kg ha−1 compared to rainfed crop without moisture conservation (690 kg ha−1). Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years indicated that conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield with Visista (1880 kg ha−1) followed by Kadiri Lepakshi (1620 kg ha−1), Harithandra (1409 kg ha−1), Dharani (1406 kg ha−1), K6 (1384 kg ha−1) Amaravathi (1202 kg ha−1) and K9 (1198 kg ha−1) compared to only conservation furrows.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
In pigeonpea, conservation furrows in each row with sub soiling at one meter and shell mulching gave higher seed yield than rainfed crop without moisture conservation.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- conservation furrows in each row followed by sub soiling at one meter distance and shell mulchinge1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- rainfed crop without moisture conservatione1
- Setting
- AICRPDA, Ananthapuramu, ANGRAU, Andhra Pradeshe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at AICRPDA, Ananthapuramu, ANGRAU, Andhra Pradesh”
e1“In pigeonpea, the mean data of three years indicated that, conservation furrows in each row followed by sub soiling at one meter distance and shell mulching gave higher seed yield compared to rainfed crop without moisture conservation”
Claim · model-written summary
In castor, sub soiling at one meter with conservation furrows and shell mulching gave higher seed yield, 892 kg ha−1, than rainfed crop without moisture conservation (690 kg ha−1).
- Taxon
- castor
Ricinus communise1 - Treatment
- sub soiling at one meter distance followed by conservation furrows in each row and shell mulchinge1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 892 kg ha−1e1
- Qualifier
- 690 kg ha−1e1
- Comparator
- rainfed crop without moisture conservatione1
- Setting
- AICRPDA, Ananthapuramu, ANGRAU, Andhra Pradeshe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at AICRPDA, Ananthapuramu, ANGRAU, Andhra Pradesh”
e1“In castor, mean data of three years indicated that sub soiling at one meter distance followed by conservation furrows in each row and shell mulching gave higher seed yield of 892 kg ha−1 compared to rainfed crop without moisture conservation (690 kg ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut variety Visista gave 1880 kg ha−1 pod yield under conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Material
- Visistae3
- Treatment
- conservation furrows with supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1880 kg ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- mean data of different yearse0
- Comparator
- conservation furrowse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years”
e1“conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield”
e2“compared to only conservation furrows”
e3“Visista (1880 kg ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut variety Kadiri Lepakshi gave 1620 kg ha−1 pod yield under conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Kadiri Lepakshie3
- Treatment
- conservation furrows with supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1620 kg ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- mean data of different yearse0
- Comparator
- conservation furrowse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years”
e1“conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield”
e2“compared to only conservation furrows”
e3“Kadiri Lepakshi (1620 kg ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut variety Harithandra gave 1409 kg ha−1 pod yield under conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Harithandrae3
- Treatment
- conservation furrows with supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1409 kg ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- mean data of different yearse0
- Comparator
- conservation furrowse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years”
e1“conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield”
e2“compared to only conservation furrows”
e3“Harithandra (1409 kg ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut variety Dharani gave 1406 kg ha−1 pod yield under conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Dharanie3
- Treatment
- conservation furrows with supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1406 kg ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- mean data of different yearse0
- Comparator
- conservation furrowse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years”
e1“conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield”
e2“compared to only conservation furrows”
e3“Dharani (1406 kg ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut variety K6 gave 1384 kg ha−1 pod yield under conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- K6e3
- Treatment
- conservation furrows with supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1384 kg ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- mean data of different yearse0
- Comparator
- conservation furrowse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years”
e1“conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield”
e2“compared to only conservation furrows”
e3“K6 (1384 kg ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut variety Amaravathi gave 1202 kg ha−1 pod yield under conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Amaravathie3
- Treatment
- conservation furrows with supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1202 kg ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- mean data of different yearse0
- Comparator
- conservation furrowse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years”
e1“conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield”
e2“compared to only conservation furrows”
e3“Amaravathi (1202 kg ha−1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut variety K9 gave 1198 kg ha−1 pod yield under conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- K9e3
- Treatment
- conservation furrows with supplemental irrigatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1198 kg ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- mean data of different yearse0
- Comparator
- conservation furrowse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among groundnut varieties, mean data of different years”
e1“conservation furrows with supplemental irrigation recorded higher pod yield”
e2“compared to only conservation furrows”
e3“K9 (1198 kg ha−1)”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
187 papers more in this group
See all 191 papers →mulching · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.