Paper · 2020 · Journal of Oilseeds Research

Yield and economics of soybean based cropping systems as influenced by different cropping systems, crop establishment method and residue management practices

R K VERMA; M RAGHAVENDRA; S D BILLORE; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Significantly higher yield of soybean was registered under soybean-chickpea system. The increase in yield wasup to 21.5% under permanent broad bed and furrow (PBBF) + residue retention (R) and 14% under PBBF + withoutR (WR) as compared to conventional flatbed (CTFP) + WR. Similarly, significantly higher yield of wheat and chickpeawere registered under PBBF + R followed by PBBF + WR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was significantly higher under soybean-chickpea system.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soybean-chickpea systeme0
Outcome
yield of soybeane0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yield of soybean was registered under soybean-chickpea system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBBF plus residue retention increased soybean yield up to 21.5% compared with conventional flatbed without residue.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
permanent broad bed and furrow (PBBF) + residue retention (R)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.5%e0
Comparator
conventional flatbed (CTFP) + WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in yield wasup to 21.5% under permanent broad bed and furrow (PBBF) + residue retention (R) and 14% under PBBF + withoutR (WR) as compared to conventional flatbed (CTFP) + WR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBBF without residue increased soybean yield 14% compared with conventional flatbed without residue.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
PBBF + withoutR (WR)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
conventional flatbed (CTFP) + WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in yield wasup to 21.5% under permanent broad bed and furrow (PBBF) + residue retention (R) and 14% under PBBF + withoutR (WR) as compared to conventional flatbed (CTFP) + WR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was significantly higher under PBBF plus residue retention, followed by PBBF without residue.

Treatment
PBBF + Re0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
PBBF + WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher yield of wheat and chickpeawere registered under PBBF + R followed by PBBF + WR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yield was significantly higher under PBBF plus residue retention, followed by PBBF without residue.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
PBBF + Re0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
PBBF + WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher yield of wheat and chickpeawere registered under PBBF + R followed by PBBF + WR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–384 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 264 positive, 79 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.