Abstract
Agricultural Engineering Sciences - University of Baghdad for the fall season 2016. Aloe vera seedlings were selected with a high degree of homogeneity in terms of vegetative growth and number of leaves, and the plants were distributed as a factorial experiment according to the RCBD randomized complete block design, with three replications and an average of six plants in the experimental unit. Results revealed significant differences in most of the studied traits. They showed the superiority of the N3P3 interference treatment by giving the highest values in the number of leaves, leaf width and thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter (15.83 leaves. and 217.46 g. plant-1), respectively. As for the effect of spraying with amino acids, treatment N3 excelled in the characteristics of leaf thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter, which amounted to 1.828 mm. leaf and 273.0 g. leaf and 157.23 g. leaf-1 in sequence. The treatment of P3 spraying surpassed the characteristic of leaf thickness and plant yield of dry matter, which amounted to 1.822 mm. leaf-1 and 191.61 g. plant-1. The results did not show significant differences between spraying with amino acids and phosphorous treatments in plant length and leaf width. Keywords: Aloe vera, biostimulant, amino acids, phosphorous
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
N3P3 gave the highest leaf number, reported as 15.83 leaves.
- Treatment
- N3P3 interference treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 15.83 leaves.e0
Aloe veraNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of the N3P3 interference treatment by giving the highest values in the number of leaves, leaf width and thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter (15.83 leaves. and 217.46 g. plant-1)”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
N3P3 gave the highest leaf width, thickness, and fresh leaf weight.
- Treatment
- N3P3 interference treatmente0
- Outcome
- leaf width and thickness, fresh weight of leavese0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of the N3P3 interference treatment by giving the highest values in the number of leaves, leaf width and thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
N3P3 gave the highest plant dry matter yield, reported as 217.46 g. plant-1.
- Treatment
- N3P3 interference treatmente0
- Outcome
- plant yield of dry mattere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 217.46 g. plant-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of the N3P3 interference treatment by giving the highest values in the number of leaves, leaf width and thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter (15.83 leaves. and 217.46 g. plant-1)”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
N3 amino acid spraying excelled for leaf thickness, at 1.828 mm. leaf.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment N3 excelled in the characteristics of leaf thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter, which amounted to 1.828 mm. leaf and 273.0 g. leaf and 157.23 g. leaf-1”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
N3 amino acid spraying excelled for fresh leaf weight, at 273.0 g. leaf.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment N3 excelled in the characteristics of leaf thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter, which amounted to 1.828 mm. leaf and 273.0 g. leaf and 157.23 g. leaf-1”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
N3 amino acid spraying excelled for plant dry matter yield, at 157.23 g. leaf-1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment N3 excelled in the characteristics of leaf thickness, fresh weight of leaves and plant yield of dry matter, which amounted to 1.828 mm. leaf and 273.0 g. leaf and 157.23 g. leaf-1”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
P3 spraying surpassed for leaf thickness, at 1.822 mm. leaf-1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment of P3 spraying surpassed the characteristic of leaf thickness and plant yield of dry matter, which amounted to 1.822 mm. leaf-1 and 191.61 g. plant-1”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
P3 spraying surpassed for plant dry matter yield, at 191.61 g. plant-1.
- Treatment
- P3 sprayinge0
- Outcome
- plant yield of dry mattere0
- Direction
- surpassede0
- Value
- 191.61 g. plant-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment of P3 spraying surpassed the characteristic of leaf thickness and plant yield of dry matter, which amounted to 1.822 mm. leaf-1 and 191.61 g. plant-1”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Amino acid and phosphorus treatments did not differ significantly in plant length and leaf width.
- Treatment
- spraying with amino acidse0
- Outcome
- plant length and leaf widthe0
- Direction
- did not show significant differencese0
- Comparator
- phosphorous treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“did not show significant differences between spraying with amino acids and phosphorous treatments in plant length and leaf width”
e1“Aloe vera seedlings”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Aloe vera (aloe-vera)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.