Paper · 2023 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Assessing the impact of plant growth regulators on anther retention and Fusarium head blight in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) infected by Fusarium graminearum in field conditions

Younyoung Lee; Anita L. Brûlé-Babel; Yvonne E. Lawley; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance in wheat is often associated with undesirable agronomic traits such as tall plant height and a propensity for lodging. Plant height in wheat is genetically controlled by some semi-dwarfing alleles that alter the plant's sensitivity to gibberellins (GAs). The presence of semi-dwarfing alleles increases the frequency of anther retention, which may contribute to FHB susceptibility by providing an initiation site for infection. The application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) may enable farmers to grow the most resistant cultivars while controlling plant height to minimize lodging risk. In this study, five spring wheat cultivars that differed in level of FHB resistance, height, and semi-dwarfing alleles were tested to determine the effect of PGRs, specifically Manipulator™ and Ethrel™, on plant height, anther retention, and FHB resistance level and the interactions between them in Winnipeg and Carman, Manitoba in 2019 and 2020. Combined field results showed that Ethrel™ significantly reduced plant height. Both PGRs did not affect the anther retention or FHB resistance levels of the tested cultivars under dry conditions. There were significant interactions between variables, but they were relatively small compared to the main treatment and cultivars. Based on the results of this study, producers could benefit from the higher levels of FHB resistance often associated with tall cultivars and use PGRs to manage plant height and lodging without increased risk of FHB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel significantly reduced plant height in spring wheat in combined field results.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Ethrel™e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Combined field results showed that Ethrel™ significantly reduced plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both PGRs (Manipulator and Ethrel) did not affect anther retention or FHB resistance level of the tested cultivars under dry conditions.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Both PGRse0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt1pathogen
Outcome
anther retention or FHB resistance levelse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
under dry conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–164 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both PGRs did not affect the anther retention or FHB resistance levels of the tested cultivars under dry conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were significant interactions between variables, but they were relatively small compared to the main treatment and cultivar effects.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
interactions between variablese0
Qualifier
relatively small compared to the main treatment and cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were significant interactions between variables, but they were relatively small compared to the main treatment and cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1303 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Producers could benefit from the higher FHB resistance often associated with tall cultivars and use PGRs to manage plant height and lodging without increased FHB risk.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
use PGRse0
Outcome
manage plant height and lodging without increased risk of FHBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“producers could benefit from the higher levels of FHB resistance often associated with tall cultivars and use PGRs to manage plant height and lodging without increased risk of FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1520 · show in text ↑

class · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.