Paper · 2023 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Lime microdosing: A new liming strategy for increased productivity in acid soils

Sampson Agyin‐Birikorang; Raphael Adu‐Gyamfi; Davie M. Kadyampakeni; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Despite the effectiveness of the fertilizer microdosing technique, lime microdosing (LMD) to alleviate the negative impacts of soil acidity has not been comprehensively assessed. In a 3‐year study at four sites across three countries (one in the United States, two in Ghana, and one in Burkina Faso), we evaluated the effectiveness of the microdosing technique for lime application to alleviate the adverse effects of soil acidity in cropping systems, using corn ( Zea mays L.) as the study crop. LMD was evaluated at four lime application rates, including 5%, 10%, 25%, and 50% of the calculated lime‐requirement rate (LR), which was compared to the traditional lime broadcasting strategy using 75% and 100% LR. Averaged across all experimental sites for the duration of the study, LMD with 25% LR resulted in similar grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiency as those of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR, but significantly greater than those of the lime broadcast techniques with 75% LR. Postharvest rhizosphere aluminum saturation percentage of the LMD with 25% LR was similar to that of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR. However, LMD with lime application rates lower than 25% LR was not agronomically effective. The combined results suggest that LMD could be an efficient liming technique, and that with this technique, as little lime material as 25% LR could be used to mitigate the negative impacts of Al toxicity associated with soil acidity. Nevertheless, economic analyses are required to determine the profitability of utilizing the LMD technique to mitigate the negative impacts of soil acidity on crop production relative to the traditional lime‐broadcast approach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% LR, lime microdosing produced grain yield similar to broadcast lime at 100% LR.

Treatment
LMD with 25% LRe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LMD with 25% LR resulted in similar grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiency as those of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% LR, lime microdosing produced nutrient recovery efficiencies similar to broadcast lime at 100% LR.

Treatment
LMD with 25% LRe0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiencye0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LMD with 25% LR resulted in similar grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiency as those of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime microdosing at 25% LR gave greater grain yield than broadcast lime at 75% LR.

Treatment
LMD with 25% LRe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
lime broadcast techniques with 75% LRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LMD with 25% LR resulted in similar grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiency as those of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR, but significantly greater than those of the lime broadcast techniques with 75% LR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime microdosing at 25% LR gave greater nutrient recovery efficiency than broadcast lime at 75% LR.

Treatment
LMD with 25% LRe0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
lime broadcast techniques with 75% LRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LMD with 25% LR resulted in similar grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiency as those of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR, but significantly greater than those of the lime broadcast techniques with 75% LR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest rhizosphere aluminum saturation under 25% LR microdosing was similar to broadcast 100% LR.

Treatment
LMD with 25% LRe0
Outcome
Postharvest rhizosphere aluminum saturation percentagee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postharvest rhizosphere aluminum saturation percentage of the LMD with 25% LR was similar to that of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microdosing rates below 25% LR were not agronomically effective.

Treatment
LMD with lime application rates lower than 25% LRe0
Outcome
not agronomically effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LMD with lime application rates lower than 25% LR was not agronomically effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that 25% LR microdosing can mitigate aluminum toxicity associated with acidity.

Treatment
25% LRe0
Outcome
mitigate the negative impacts of Al toxicity associated with soil aciditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as little lime material as 25% LR could be used to mitigate the negative impacts of Al toxicity associated with soil acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1533 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

lime · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.