Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lime microdosing at 25% LR gave greater nutrient recovery efficiency than broadcast lime at 75% LR.

A claim from Lime microdosing: A new liming strategy for increased productivity in acid soils · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime microdosing at 25% LR gave greater nutrient recovery efficiency than broadcast lime at 75% LR.

Treatment
LMD with 25% LRe0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
lime broadcast techniques with 75% LRe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LMD with 25% LR resulted in similar grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium recovery efficiency as those of the traditional lime broadcast techniques with 100% LR, but significantly greater than those of the lime broadcast techniques with 75% LR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1050
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–486

Title

Lime microdosing: A new liming strategy for increased productivity in acid soils

Sampson Agyin‐Birikorang; Raphael Adu‐Gyamfi; Davie M. Kadyampakeni; et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2023. doi:10.1002/saj2.20610

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a1e1748db67f2bbf3e8be1c11c97585562d302617207d5e8a3e5a327c55832a2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

lime · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.