Paper · 2023 · Advances in Horticultural Science

Pruning terms and techniques affect vigour and flower formation of Ukrainian sweet cherry trees

Pavlo Bondarenko; Olha Alekseeva; Volodymyr Senin; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Excessive tree vigour and late entrance into full production, inherent to sweet cherry trees, are major challenges in the intensive cultivation of this crop. Possible ways to reduce the vigour and stimulate flower induction include shifting the term of pruning and reducing its severity. However, the reaction of the trees may differ depending on specific cultivar, soil and climatic conditions. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the effect of various techniques and terms of pruning on young sweet cherry trees in order to adapt the intensive cultivation technology to the arid conditions of southern Ukraine. The results showed a strong cultivar-specific reaction to various pruning treatments. Pruning young sweet cherry trees in late summer contributed to a reduction of trunk and canopy indices by 11-22% on one of the cultivars and an increase in the number of flowers per tree by 1.4-1.7 times on both cultivars, compared to dormant pruning. Low severity pruning reduced 1-year-old shoot length by 9-25% and increased the number of flowers by 1.5-2.5 times compared to more aggressive pruning. The effect of pruning treatments on tree vigour was more pronounced during the first and second year of their application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late summer pruning reduced trunk and canopy indices by 11-22% in one cultivar versus dormant pruning.

Taxon
sweet cherry treesPrunus aviume0
Treatment
Pruning young sweet cherry trees in late summere0
Outcome
trunk and canopy indicese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
11-22%e0
Qualifier
one of the cultivarse0
Comparator
dormant pruninge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning young sweet cherry trees in late summer contributed to a reduction of trunk and canopy indices by 11-22% on one of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to dormant pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late summer pruning increased flower numbers by 1.4-1.7 times in both cultivars versus dormant pruning.

Taxon
sweet cherry treesPrunus aviume0
Treatment
Pruning young sweet cherry trees in late summere0
Outcome
number of flowers per treee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.4-1.7 timese0
Qualifier
both cultivarse0
Comparator
dormant pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning young sweet cherry trees in late summer contributed to a reduction of trunk and canopy indices by 11-22% on one of the cultivars and an increase in the number of flowers per tree by 1.4-1.7 times on both cultivars, compared to dormant pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low severity pruning reduced one-year shoot length by 9-25% versus more aggressive pruning.

Taxon
sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Low severity pruninge0
Outcome
1-year-old shoot lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9-25%e0
Comparator
more aggressive pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low severity pruning reduced 1-year-old shoot length by 9-25% and increased the number of flowers by 1.5-2.5 times compared to more aggressive pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low severity pruning increased flower number by 1.5-2.5 times versus more aggressive pruning.

Taxon
sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Low severity pruninge0
Outcome
number of flowerse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.5-2.5 timese0
Comparator
more aggressive pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low severity pruning reduced 1-year-old shoot length by 9-25% and increased the number of flowers by 1.5-2.5 times compared to more aggressive pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning effects on vigour were more pronounced in the first two years.

Taxon
sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
Outcome
tree vigoure0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
first and second year of their applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of pruning treatments on tree vigour was more pronounced during the first and second year of their application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pruning · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.