Paper · 2023 · Functional Plant Biology

Changes in morphological traits associated with waterlogging, salinity and saline waterlogging in Festuca arundinacea

Federico Emanuel Menon-Martínez; Agustín Alberto Grimoldi; Gustavo Gabriel Striker; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rising incidences of waterlogging and salinity, particularly in extensive livestock farming areas, pose increasing challenges to plant growth. This study investigated the morphological growth responses and tolerance of 39 Festuca arundinacea accessions to these stresses, with tolerance quantified by the relative growth rate under stress versus control conditions. Notably, more productive accessions under normal conditions also showed greater stress tolerance. Waterlogging was generally well-tolerated (89-113% of control relative growth rate), without significantly altering growth morphological components as increases in specific leaf area were offset by reductions in leaf weight ratio, maintaining stable leaf area ratios. Conversely, salinity and combined saline waterlogging significantly reduced relative growth rate (56-94% of control), with a substantial variation among accessions. A decrease in specific leaf area, suggestive of thicker leaves, correlated with higher tolerance to salinity and saline waterlogging (r =0.63). In summary, F. arundinacea displays diverse tolerance to these stresses, warranting further study into the adaptive mechanisms. Specific leaf area emerges as a potential selection marker for breeding programs targeting saline and waterlogging tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More productive Festuca accessions under normal conditions had greater stress tolerance.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Material
accessionse0
Outcome
stress tolerancee0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
under normal conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more productive accessions under normal conditions also showed greater stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging gave 89-113% of control relative growth rate and was generally well tolerated.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Value
89-113%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging was generally well-tolerated (89-113% of control relative growth rate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging did not significantly alter morphological growth components.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Outcome
growth morphological componentse0
Direction
without significantly alteringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging was generally well-tolerated (89-113% of control relative growth rate), without significantly altering growth morphological components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased specific leaf area.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Waterlogginge1
Outcome
specific leaf areae0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in specific leaf area were offset by reductions in leaf weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“Waterlogging was generally well-tolerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced leaf weight ratio.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Waterlogginge1
Outcome
leaf weight ratioe0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in specific leaf area were offset by reductions in leaf weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“Waterlogging was generally well-tolerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging maintained stable leaf area ratios.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Waterlogginge1
Outcome
leaf area ratiose0
Direction
stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining stable leaf area ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–730 · show in text ↑
e1

“Waterlogging was generally well-tolerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced relative growth rate to 56-94% of control.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56-94%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity and combined saline waterlogging significantly reduced relative growth rate (56-94% of control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined saline waterlogging significantly reduced relative growth rate to 56-94% of control.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
combined saline waterlogginge0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56-94%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity and combined saline waterlogging significantly reduced relative growth rate (56-94% of control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth response under salinity and combined saline waterlogging varied substantially among accessions.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Material
accessionse0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
substantial variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity and combined saline waterlogging significantly reduced relative growth rate (56-94% of control), with a substantial variation among accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower specific leaf area correlated with higher salinity tolerance (r =0.63).

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
tolerance to salinitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
r =0.63e0
Qualifier
A decrease in specific leaf areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in specific leaf area, suggestive of thicker leaves, correlated with higher tolerance to salinity and saline waterlogging (r =0.63)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower specific leaf area correlated with higher saline waterlogging tolerance (r =0.63).

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
tolerance to salinity and saline waterlogginge0
Direction
highere0
Value
r =0.63e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in specific leaf area, suggestive of thicker leaves, correlated with higher tolerance to salinity and saline waterlogging (r =0.63)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area was proposed as a selection marker for saline and waterlogging tolerance breeding.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceumt0
Outcome
potential selection marker for breeding programs targeting saline and waterlogging tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific leaf area emerges as a potential selection marker for breeding programs targeting saline and waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–117 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.