flooding · Growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)

Results differ8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ

15 claims from these papers; 6 citations between them.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2

2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

Turfgrasses Responded Differently to Salinity, Waterlogging, and Combined Saline–Waterlogging Conditions (2013)
increaseWaterlogging increased shoot dry weight and water content relative to control.
Aerenchyma Formation in Adventitious Roots of Tall Fescue and Cocksfoot under Waterlogged Conditions (2021)
no changeWaterlogging did not change shoot biomass of tall fescue cultivars.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
Waterlogging Influence on Roughstalk Bluegrass (Poa trivialis) and Tall Fescue Germination (2017)
decreaseSimulated waterlogging for 28 d reduced tall fescue aboveground biomass by 46%.
Aerenchyma Formation in Adventitious Roots of Tall Fescue and Cocksfoot under Waterlogged Conditions (2021)
no changeWaterlogging did not change shoot biomass of tall fescue cultivars.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →

How these papers cite each other

6 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 4 across the two sides.

Positive result
Negative result or no effect
Citation, pointing to the cited paper
Citation across the two sides
Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 3

Turfgrasses Responded Differently to Salinity, Waterlogging, and Combined Saline–Waterlogging Conditions · 2013
- positive
  Waterlogging increased shoot dry weight and water content relative to control.
  compared with control treatment
cited by 2 papers here
Aerenchyma Formation in Adventitious Roots of Tall Fescue and Cocksfoot under Waterlogged Conditions · 2021
- positive
  Waterlogging increased adventitious root and aerenchyma formation in tall fescue.
- no effect
  Waterlogging did not change shoot biomass of tall fescue cultivars.
  compared with control plants
- negative
  Waterlogging reduced root dry matter of tall fescue by 38%.
cites 1 paper here
Changes in morphological traits associated with waterlogging, salinity and saline waterlogging in Festuca arundinacea · 2023
- positive
  Waterlogging gave 89-113% of control relative growth rate and was generally well tolerated.
  compared with control
- no effect
  Waterlogging maintained stable leaf area ratios.
- no effect
  Waterlogging did not significantly alter morphological growth components.
- negative
  Combined saline waterlogging significantly reduced relative growth rate to 56-94% of control.
  compared with control
cites 3 papers here

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5

Growth during recovery evidences the waterlogging tolerance of forage grasses · 2017
- negative
  F. arundinacea root RGR declined during waterlogging.
cited by 2 papers here
Comparison of growth and physiological characteristics between roughstalk bluegrass and tall fescue in response to simulated waterlogging · 2017
- negative
  After four weeks of waterlogging, leaf number, plant height and root biomass declined more in tall fescue than roughstalk bluegrass.
  compared with roughstalk bluegrass
cites 1 paper herecited by 2 papers here
Waterlogging Influence on Roughstalk Bluegrass (Poa trivialis) and Tall Fescue Germination · 2017
- negative
  Simulated waterlogging for 28 d reduced tall fescue aboveground biomass by 46%.
- no effect
  Simulated waterlogging did not influence tall fescue seedling survival.
Recovery from short-term complete submergence in temperate pasture grasses · 2018
- negative
  Schedonorus arundinaceus dry mass decreased by 40% under submergence.
- no effect
  Schedonorus arundinaceus shoot relative growth rate during recovery was similar to controls.
  compared with controls
cites 1 paper here
Response of endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue plants to partial submergence at two developmental stages · 2024
- no effect
  Partial submergence did not affect germination of produced seeds.

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

flooding on Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue) against other targets

YieldResults agree

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2

How these papers cite each other

Papers reporting a positive result 3

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5

flooding on Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue) against other targets

flooding · growth on other organisms