Paper · 2024 · Austral Ecology

Response of endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue plants to partial submergence at two developmental stages

Lucas R. Petigrosso; Osvaldo R. Vignolio; Pedro E. Gundel; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) is a perennial C 3 grass species usually associated with the endophyte fungus Epichloë coenophiala that enhances tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Given that the proportion of infected tall fescue plants in the grasslands of the Flooding Pampa (Argentina) has been progressively increasing, it is proposed that endophytes confer tolerance to the stresses characteristic of that environment, especially flooding. Plants from a naturalized population and a commercial cultivar were grown, both with and without endophyte (wild type and AR584 respectively). The plants were subjected to two submergence treatments (i.e., control and partial submergence) in two development stages (5‐leaf stage and beginning of the elongation of internodes). Plant performance (aerial and root biomass, root aerenchyma formation, total root length and root diameter, proportion of reproductive tillers, number of panicles and seeds produced) and endophyte transmission to progeny were evaluated. Endophytes did not alter the ecological fitness of plants under partial submergence. Independently of the water condition, the symbiosis was linked to low biomass in plants from the naturalized population, while the opposite occurred in plants from the cultivar. Partial submergence did not affect the germination of the seeds produced, nor the transmission of the endophyte to the seedlings that originated from them. Our work suggests that the invasion ability of tall fescue in the Flooding Pampa grasslands is not related to an endophyte‐mediated improvement of plants to tolerate water excess.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytes did not alter tall fescue ecological fitness under partial submergence.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
endophyte‐infectedt0
Outcome
ecological fitness of plantse0
Direction
did not altere0
Comparator
endophyte‐freet0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endophytes did not alter the ecological fitness of plants under partial submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte symbiosis was linked to low biomass in the naturalized population regardless of water condition.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
naturalized populatione0
Interactor
endophytet0symbiont
Outcome
low biomasse0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
Independently of the water conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Independently of the water condition, the symbiosis was linked to low biomass in plants from the naturalized population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar showed the opposite biomass relationship with endophyte symbiosis.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
cultivare0
Interactor
endophytet0symbiont
Outcome
oppositee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“while the opposite occurred in plants from the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial submergence did not affect germination of produced seeds.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Partial submergencee0
Outcome
germination of the seeds producede0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partial submergence did not affect the germination of the seeds produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial submergence did not affect endophyte transmission to seedlings.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Partial submergencee0
Interactor
endophytee0symbiont
Outcome
transmission of the endophyte to the seedlingse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partial submergence did not affect the germination of the seeds produced, nor the transmission of the endophyte to the seedlings that originated from them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“tall fescue plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.