Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Aerenchyma Formation in Adventitious Roots of Tall Fescue and Cocksfoot under Waterlogged Conditions

Nguyen Thi Mui; Meixue Zhou; David Parsons; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The formation of aerenchyma in adventitious roots is one of the most crucial adaptive traits for waterlogging tolerance in plants. Pasture grasses, like other crops, can be affected by waterlogging, and there is scope to improve tolerance through breeding. In this study, two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP, were selected to investigate the effects of waterlogging on root growth and morphological change. Cultivars were subjected to four periods of waterlogging treatments (7, 14, 21 and 28 days), while comparable plants were kept under free drained control conditions. The experiment was arranged as a split–split plot design, with waterlogging treatments (waterlogged, control) considered as main plots, time periods (days of waterlogging) as subplots and cultivars as sub-subplots. Plants began to show signs of waterlogging stress 14–21 days after the onset of waterlogging treatments. There were no significant differences in shoot biomass between the waterlogged and control plants of any cultivar. However, waterlogging significantly reduced root dry matter in all cultivars, with greater reduction in cocksfoot (56%) than in tall fescue (38%). Waterlogging also led to increased adventitious root and aerenchyma formation in both species. Cocksfoot cultivars showed a greater increase in adventitious roots, while tall fescue cultivars had a greater proportion of aerenchyma. Both cultivars within each species showed similar responses to waterlogging treatments. However, an extended screening program is needed to identify whether there are varietal differences within species, which could be used to discover genes related to aerenchyma or adventitious root formation (waterlogging tolerance) for use in breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging did not change shoot biomass of cocksfoot cultivars.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Treatment
waterlogging treatmentse1
Outcome
shoot biomasse2
Direction
no significant differencese2
Comparator
control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivars were subjected to four periods of waterlogging treatments (7, 14, 21 and 28 days), while comparable plants were kept under free drained control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–752 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were no significant differences in shoot biomass between the waterlogged and control plants of any cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging did not change shoot biomass of tall fescue cultivars.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
waterlogging treatmentse1
Outcome
shoot biomasse2
Direction
no significant differencese2
Comparator
control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivars were subjected to four periods of waterlogging treatments (7, 14, 21 and 28 days), while comparable plants were kept under free drained control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–752 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were no significant differences in shoot biomass between the waterlogged and control plants of any cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced root dry matter of cocksfoot by 56%.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Treatment
waterlogginge3
Outcome
root dry mattere3
Direction
reducede3
Value
56%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e3

“waterlogging significantly reduced root dry matter in all cultivars, with greater reduction in cocksfoot (56%) than in tall fescue (38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced root dry matter of tall fescue by 38%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
waterlogginge3
Outcome
root dry mattere3
Direction
reducede3
Value
38%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e3

“waterlogging significantly reduced root dry matter in all cultivars, with greater reduction in cocksfoot (56%) than in tall fescue (38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased adventitious root and aerenchyma formation in cocksfoot.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Treatment
Waterlogginge4
Outcome
adventitious root and aerenchyma formatione4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e4

“Waterlogging also led to increased adventitious root and aerenchyma formation in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased adventitious root and aerenchyma formation in tall fescue.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
Waterlogginge4
Outcome
adventitious root and aerenchyma formatione4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e4

“Waterlogging also led to increased adventitious root and aerenchyma formation in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1429 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocksfoot cultivars showed a greater increase in adventitious roots than tall fescue cultivars.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Outcome
adventitious rootse5
Direction
greater increasee5
Comparator
tall fescue cultivarse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cocksfoot cultivars showed a greater increase in adventitious roots, while tall fescue cultivars had a greater proportion of aerenchyma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1566 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall fescue cultivars had a greater proportion of aerenchyma than cocksfoot cultivars.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
proportion of aerenchymae5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
Cocksfoot cultivarse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cocksfoot cultivars showed a greater increase in adventitious roots, while tall fescue cultivars had a greater proportion of aerenchyma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cocksfoot cultivars showed similar responses to waterlogging.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Outcome
responses to waterlogging treatmentse6
Direction
similare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e6

“Both cultivars within each species showed similar responses to waterlogging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1654 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both tall fescue cultivars showed similar responses to waterlogging.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
responses to waterlogging treatmentse6
Direction
similare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e6

“Both cultivars within each species showed similar responses to waterlogging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1654 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants of cocksfoot began to show signs of waterlogging stress 14–21 days after the onset of waterlogging.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Outcome
signs of waterlogging stresse7
Qualifier
after the onset of waterlogging treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e7

“Plants began to show signs of waterlogging stress 14–21 days after the onset of waterlogging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants of tall fescue began to show signs of waterlogging stress 14–21 days after the onset of waterlogging.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
signs of waterlogging stresse7
Qualifier
after the onset of waterlogging treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e7

“Plants began to show signs of waterlogging stress 14–21 days after the onset of waterlogging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1072 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An extended screening program is needed to find varietal differences in cocksfoot that could be used in breeding for waterlogging tolerance.

Taxon
cocksfootDactylis glomeratae0
Outcome
varietal differences within speciese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e7

“an extended screening program is needed to identify whether there are varietal differences within species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1770 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An extended screening program is needed to find varietal differences in tall fescue that could be used in breeding for waterlogging tolerance.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
varietal differences within speciese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488 · show in text ↑
e7

“an extended screening program is needed to identify whether there are varietal differences within species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1770 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

flooding · growth · Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.