Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Waterlogging reduced root dry matter of tall fescue by 38%.

A claim from Aerenchyma Formation in Adventitious Roots of Tall Fescue and Cocksfoot under Waterlogged Conditions · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced root dry matter of tall fescue by 38%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
waterlogginge3
Outcome
root dry mattere3
Direction
reducede3
Value
38%e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two summer-active cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) cultivars, Lazuly and Porto, and two summer-active tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb., syn. Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars, Hummer and Quantum II MaxP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–488
e3

“waterlogging significantly reduced root dry matter in all cultivars, with greater reduction in cocksfoot (56%) than in tall fescue (38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1334

Title

Aerenchyma Formation in Adventitious Roots of Tall Fescue and Cocksfoot under Waterlogged Conditions

Nguyen Thi Mui; Meixue Zhou; David Parsons; et al. Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11122487

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-855e8a63fefad02f11d08e93b7c5f554edb6807045d021ad960dde470f3b7976 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

flooding · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.