Abstract
The present investigation was carried out in Rabi (winter) season 2022-23 at Agronomy Research Farm of Chandra Bhanu Gupta Post Graduate College, Bakshi ka Talab, Lucknow (U.P). The treatments comprised of four nitrogen levels viz., 0, 15, 30 and 45 kg N ha-1 with four phosphorus levels viz., 0, 20, 40 and 60 kg P2O5 were tried in Factorial Randomized Block Design. The soil was silty-loam texture with slightly alkaline pH 8.1, organic carbon 0.70 %, available nitrogen 270.00 kg ha-1, available phosphorus 27.0 kg ha-1, and available potash 262.0 kg ha-1 during 2022- 2023. The rainfall received during the crop period was 0.00 and 0.02 mm, respectively. The relative humidity was recorded maximum during month of December study while, the sunshine ranged from 2.3 to 9.1 during crop period. Increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphorus significantly increased most of the growth and yield attributing characters viz., plant height, number of branches, dry matter accumulation and yield attributes viz., number of pods plant-1, number of grains pod-1, grain weight and test weight were significantly higher with 45 kg N ha-1 and 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and superior to other doses of nitrogen and phosphorus. Yield studies viz., Grain yield, straw yield and biological yield were significantly higher with 45 kg N ha-1 and 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and superior to other doses of nitrogen and phosphorus. The N and P content % and uptake increased with increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. The highest nutrient content and uptake were recorded with 45 kg N ha-1 with 60 kg P2O5 ha-1. Economics analysis viz., gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio was recorded highest with 45 kg N ha-1 + 60 kg P2O5 while lowest with control. Thus for obtaining better yield and profit apply 45 kg N ha-1 in combination with 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 for lentil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen and phosphorus levels significantly increased most growth and yield attributing characters of lentil.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphoruse1
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributing characterse1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”
e1“Increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphorus significantly increased most of the growth and yield attributing characters”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain, straw and biological yield of lentil were significantly higher with 45 kg N ha-1 and 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 than with other nitrogen and phosphorus doses.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- 45 kg N ha-1 and 60 kg P2O5 ha-1e2
- Outcome
- Grain yield, straw yield and biological yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- other doses of nitrogen and phosphoruse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”
e2“Yield studies viz., Grain yield, straw yield and biological yield were significantly higher with 45 kg N ha-1 and 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and superior to other doses of nitrogen and phosphorus”
Claim · model-written summary
N and P content (%) and uptake of lentil increased with increasing nitrogen and phosphorus levels.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphoruse3
- Outcome
- N and P content % and uptakee3
- Direction
- increasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”
e3“The N and P content % and uptake increased with increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphorus”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio of lentil were highest with 45 kg N ha-1 plus 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and lowest in the control.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- 45 kg N ha-1 + 60 kg P2O5e4
- Outcome
- gross return, net return and benefit cost ratioe4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”
e4“Economics analysis viz., gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio was recorded highest with 45 kg N ha-1 + 60 kg P2O5 while lowest with control”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend applying 45 kg N ha-1 in combination with 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 for lentil to obtain better yield and profit.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise5
- Treatment
- 45 kg N ha-1 in combination with 60 kg P2O5 ha-1e5
- Outcome
- better yield and profite5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Thus for obtaining better yield and profit apply 45 kg N ha-1 in combination with 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 for lentil”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →phosphorus · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.