Paper · 2023 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on maize (Zea mays L.) under boron toxicity stress

Narges ABDAR; Mehdi ZAREI; Amir Ghaffar SHAHRIARI; et al.

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A greenhouse study was conducted to investigate the effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungus and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and boron (B) uptake under excessive B concentrations. Four levels of B (0, 10, 20 and 40 mg kg-1 soil) and four levels of microbial inoculation (non-inoculation, Rhizophagus intraradices, Micrococcus yunnanensis and co-inoculation) were applied. In general, elevated B decreased the maize relative yield, plant dry weight, plant height, total leaf area and chlorophyll content. The highest B uptake was recorded in the 20 mg kg-1 B treatments, whereas the lowest uptake was in B treatments of 0 and 40 mg B kg-1. Excessive B supply increased the proline content and electrolyte leakage of maize leaves. Microbial inoculation did not change the yield of B-stressed plants. In addition, mycorrhiza inoculation and co-inoculation increased the shoot and root B uptake. Maize plants growing at high B concentrations with or without microbial inoculation showed leaf edge burning and necrosis when compared with control treatments. Microbial inoculation improved the maize yield under B stress up to 20 mg B kg-1. Thus, inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria can increase the maize tolerance under B toxicity. Nonetheless, the inoculation of bacterium and arbuscular mycorrhiza had a more alleviative effect when the plants were exposed to excess B.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated boron reduced maize relative yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated Be0
Outcome
relative yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated B decreased the maize relative yield, plant dry weight, plant height, total leaf area and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated boron reduced maize dry weight, height and leaf area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated Be0
Outcome
plant dry weight, plant height, total leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated B decreased the maize relative yield, plant dry weight, plant height, total leaf area and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated boron reduced maize chlorophyll content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated Be0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated B decreased the maize relative yield, plant dry weight, plant height, total leaf area and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize boron uptake was highest at 20 mg kg-1 B.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
20 mg kg-1 Be0
Outcome
B uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest B uptake was recorded in the 20 mg kg-1 B treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize boron uptake was lowest at 0 and 40 mg B kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
0 and 40 mg B kg-1e0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest uptake was in B treatments of 0 and 40 mg B kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive boron increased maize leaf proline content and electrolyte leakage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Excessive B supplye0
Outcome
proline content and electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive B supply increased the proline content and electrolyte leakage of maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation did not change yield of boron stressed maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculation did not change the yield of B-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza inoculation increased maize shoot and root boron uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mycorrhiza inoculatione0
Outcome
shoot and root B uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhiza inoculation and co-inoculation increased the shoot and root B uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased maize shoot and root boron uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Outcome
shoot and root B uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhiza inoculation and co-inoculation increased the shoot and root B uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High boron produced leaf edge burning and necrosis in maize with or without microbial inoculation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
high B concentrationse0
Outcome
leaf edge burning and necrosise0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize plants growing at high B concentrations with or without microbial inoculation showed leaf edge burning and necrosis when compared with control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation improved maize yield under boron stress up to 20 mg B kg-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
up to 20 mg B kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculation improved the maize yield under B stress up to 20 mg B kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1169 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded inoculation can increase maize tolerance under boron toxicity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth promoting rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria can increase the maize tolerance under B toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1306 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial and mycorrhizal inoculation had a stronger alleviative effect under excess boron.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inoculation of bacterium and arbuscular mycorrhizae0
Outcome
more alleviative effecte0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation of bacterium and arbuscular mycorrhiza had a more alleviative effect when the plants were exposed to excess B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑

boron atom · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 116 positive, 6 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.