Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Aerobic rice (Oryza sativa) cultivation under drip irrigation and fertigation system

ANBARASU MARIYAPPILLAI; GURUSAMY ARUMUGAM; DURAI SINGH RAMAIAH

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the summer of 2019 and 2020 at the research field of (All Indian Coordinated Research Project on Water Management), Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, to assess the effect of drip irrigation and fertigation on aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation. The experiment was laid out in strip-plot design, replicated thrice. The irrigation was scheduled once in 3 days at 120, 100, and 80% pan Evaporation (PE), and the fertigation of 100, 75 and 50% recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF) was given weekly intervals from 15 days after sowing (DAS) to 70 DAS and the control of surface irrigation at an irrigation water: cumulative evaporation (IW : CPE) 1.25 with soil application of RDF (150 : 50 : 50 kg/NPK/ha) was separately maintained. The results of different irrigation and fertigation practices showed that, 120% PE × 100% RDF along with associated crop management had a significant effect on crop growth, yield and yield-contributing parameters and their values were significantly higher than all the other drip irrigation regimes and fertigation levels. This was mainly owing to continued availability of soil moisture and nutrients throughout the life period of aerobic rice, which led increased growth and yield parameters at the maximum level. Thus, 120% PE drip regimes and 100% RDF fertigation level proved better option in aerobic rice cultivation under drip irrigation and fertigation system in respect of yield and water saving.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120% PE with 100% RDF significantly increased growth compared with other regimes.

Treatment
120% PE × 100% RDFe0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all the other drip irrigation regimes and fertigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“120% PE × 100% RDF along with associated crop management had a significant effect on crop growth, yield and yield-contributing parameters and their values were significantly higher than all the other drip irrigation regimes and fertigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120% PE with 100% RDF significantly increased yield and yield components.

Treatment
120% PE × 100% RDFe0
Outcome
yield and yield-contributing parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all the other drip irrigation regimes and fertigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“120% PE × 100% RDF along with associated crop management had a significant effect on crop growth, yield and yield-contributing parameters and their values were significantly higher than all the other drip irrigation regimes and fertigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continued soil moisture and nutrient availability were offered as the reason for higher growth and yield.

Taxon
aerobic ricee0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
continued availability of soil moisture and nutrientse0

Verbatim

e0

“This was mainly owing to continued availability of soil moisture and nutrients throughout the life period of aerobic rice, which led increased growth and yield parameters at the maximum level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1324 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 120% PE drip irrigation with 100% RDF fertigation for yield and water saving.

Taxon
aerobic ricee0
Outcome
120% PE drip regimes and 100% RDF fertigation levele0
Qualifier
yield and water savinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, 120% PE drip regimes and 100% RDF fertigation level proved better option in aerobic rice cultivation under drip irrigation and fertigation system in respect of yield and water saving.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1514 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.