Abstract
A 2-year experiment was conducted on a clayey deep Vertisols of Bhopal to study the effect of row ra- tios and phosphorus fertilization on pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan 6 . ) Millsp.]soybean [Glycine mar 6 . ) (Merr.)] intercropping system. At 120 cm row spacing higher, number of branches, graindpod and yield were recorded in sole croppirig compared with intercropping systems. Among intercropping, 1 : 3 ratio gave significantly higher number of branches, pods, graindpod, 1,000-grain weight and grain yield than 1 : 1 ra- tio, and pigeonpea-yield equivalent increased by 31.6 and 35.3% over 1 : 1 ratio and sole pigeonpeaat 60 cm row spacing respectively. The highest landequivalent ratio (1.39), monetary yield advantage (Rs 6,712/ hala) and benefit : cost ratio of 2.8 were recorded at 1 : 3 row ratio, followed by 1 : 2 row ratio (27.5% higher pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent over sole pigeonpea at 60 cm row spacing). Consumptive water use and water-use efficiency also increased with intercropping at higher row ratios of 1 : 2 and 1 : 3. lncrease in the dose of 30 kg to 90 kg P@Qa resulted in increase of grain yield of both pigeonpea and soybean. The pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent was increased by 28.2%, the water-use efficiency by 7.7 kgha-cm, net profit by Rs 5,733rna and benefit : cost ratio by 3.45.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
At 120 cm spacing, sole pigeonpea had higher branches, grains per pod and yield than intercropping.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- sole croppirige0
- Outcome
- number of branches, graindpod and yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- 120 cm row spacinge0
- Comparator
- intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At 120 cm row spacing higher, number of branches, graindpod and yield were recorded in sole croppirig compared with intercropping systems.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
A 1:3 intercropping row ratio increased branches, pods, grains per pod, thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to 1:1.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- 1 : 3 ratioe0
- Outcome
- number of branches, pods, graindpode0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 1 : 1 ra- tioe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among intercropping, 1 : 3 ratio gave significantly higher number of branches, pods, graindpod, 1,000-grain weight and grain yield than 1 : 1 ra- tio”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1:3 row ratio raised pigeonpea-yield equivalent 31.6% over 1:1.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- 1 : 3 ratiot0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea-yield equivalente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 31.6e0
- Comparator
- 1 : 1 ratioe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea-yield equivalent increased by 31.6 and 35.3% over 1 : 1 ratio and sole pigeonpeaat 60 cm row spacing respectively.”
t0“Among intercropping, 1 : 3 ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1:3 row ratio raised pigeonpea-yield equivalent 35.3% over sole pigeonpea at 60 cm.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- 1 : 3 ratiot0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea-yield equivalente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 35.3%e0
- Comparator
- sole pigeonpeaat 60 cm row spacinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea-yield equivalent increased by 31.6 and 35.3% over 1 : 1 ratio and sole pigeonpeaat 60 cm row spacing respectively.”
t0“Among intercropping, 1 : 3 ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1:3 row ratio gave the highest land-equivalent ratio, 1.39.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- 1 : 3 row ratioe0
- Outcome
- landequivalent ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.39e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest landequivalent ratio (1.39), monetary yield advantage (Rs 6,712/ hala) and benefit : cost ratio of 2.8 were recorded at 1 : 3 row ratio”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1:3 row ratio gave a monetary yield advantage of Rs 6,712/ hala.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- 1 : 3 row ratioe0
- Outcome
- monetary yield advantagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rs 6,712/ halae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest landequivalent ratio (1.39), monetary yield advantage (Rs 6,712/ hala) and benefit : cost ratio of 2.8 were recorded at 1 : 3 row ratio”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1:3 row ratio gave a benefit:cost ratio of 2.8.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- 1 : 3 row ratioe0
- Outcome
- benefit : cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.8e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest landequivalent ratio (1.39), monetary yield advantage (Rs 6,712/ hala) and benefit : cost ratio of 2.8 were recorded at 1 : 3 row ratio”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1:2 row ratio raised pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent 27.5% over sole pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- 1 : 2 row ratioe0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 27.5%e0
- Comparator
- sole pigeonpea at 60 cm row spacinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“followed by 1 : 2 row ratio (27.5% higher pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent over sole pigeonpea at 60 cm row spacing).”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping at 1:2 and 1:3 row ratios increased consumptive water use and water-use efficiency.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- intercropping at higher row ratios of 1 : 2 and 1 : 3e0
- Outcome
- Consumptive water use and water-use efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Consumptive water use and water-use efficiency also increased with intercropping at higher row ratios of 1 : 2 and 1 : 3.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus dose from 30 to 90 kg increased pigeonpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- 30 kg to 90 kg P@Qae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lncrease in the dose of 30 kg to 90 kg P@Qa resulted in increase of grain yield of both pigeonpea and soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus dose from 30 to 90 kg increased soybean grain yield.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 30 kg to 90 kg P@Qae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lncrease in the dose of 30 kg to 90 kg P@Qa resulted in increase of grain yield of both pigeonpea and soybean.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent by 28.2%.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- phosporus fertilizationt0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 28.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent was increased by 28.2%, the water-use efficiency by 7.7 kgha-cm, net profit by Rs 5,733rna and benefit : cost ratio by 3.45.”
t0“phosporus fertilization in pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased water-use efficiency by 7.7 kgha-cm.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- phosporus fertilizationt0
- Outcome
- water-use efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7.7 kgha-cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent was increased by 28.2%, the water-use efficiency by 7.7 kgha-cm, net profit by Rs 5,733rna and benefit : cost ratio by 3.45.”
t0“phosporus fertilization in pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased net profit by Rs 5,733rna.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- phosporus fertilizationt0
- Outcome
- net profite0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- Rs 5,733rnae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent was increased by 28.2%, the water-use efficiency by 7.7 kgha-cm, net profit by Rs 5,733rna and benefit : cost ratio by 3.45.”
t0“phosporus fertilization in pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased the benefit:cost ratio by 3.45.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- phosporus fertilizationt0
- Outcome
- benefit : cost ratioe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.45e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pigeonpea-grain-yield equivalent was increased by 28.2%, the water-use efficiency by 7.7 kgha-cm, net profit by Rs 5,733rna and benefit : cost ratio by 3.45.”
t0“phosporus fertilization in pigeonpea”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →intercropping · physiology: water · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · physiology: water · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.