Abstract
An experiment was conducted during the winter season of 1992193 and 1993- 94 showed on a sandy loam soil showed that chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) responded significantly to irrigation. Application of one irrigation at branching (45 days after sowing, DAS ) produced significantly higher grain yield as compared with no-irrigation and one at pre-flowering (75 DAS) or at pod filling stage ( 105 DAS). Two irrigations at branching and pod filling stage gave the maximum grain yield. The maximum water use efficiency was recorded with one irrigation at branching.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea responded significantly to irrigation.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- responded significantlye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) responded significantly to irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
One irrigation at branching gave significantly higher grain yield than no irrigation or one irrigation at later stages.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- one irrigation at branching (45 days after sowing, DAS )e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no-irrigation and one at pre-flowering (75 DAS) or at pod filling stage ( 105 DAS)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of one irrigation at branching (45 days after sowing, DAS ) produced significantly higher grain yield as compared with no-irrigation and one at pre-flowering (75 DAS) or at pod filling stage ( 105 DAS)”
e1“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at branching and pod filling gave maximum grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- Two irrigations at branching and pod filling stagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two irrigations at branching and pod filling stage gave the maximum grain yield”
e1“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
One irrigation at branching gave maximum water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- one irrigation at branchinge0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum water use efficiency was recorded with one irrigation at branching”
e1“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.