Paper · 2023 · Journal of Ecological Engineering

Effect of Biostimulants on the Content and Uptake of Selected Macronutrients in Jerusalem Artichoke Tubers (Helianthus tuberosus L.)

Iwona Teresa Mystkowska; Aleksandra Dmitrowicz

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of biostimulants on the content and uptake of selected macronutrients (phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and potassium) in tubers of two varieties of Jerusalem artichoke. The experiment was conducted in a two-factor arrangement (split-plot) with three replications in 2021-2022 at an individual farm in Międzyrzec Podlaski, Poland. The effect of two factors was studied. The first-order factor was two varieties of Helianthus tuberosus: 'Albik' and 'Rubik', and the second-order variants of biostimulant application: Kaishi, Maral, Nutrigreen AD, and Vanadoo. The effectiveness of the application of individual biostimulants in the cultivation of two varieties of Jerusalem artichoke was compared with the control object (without the application of biostimulants). The variety 'Rubik' accumulated the most phosphorus, calcium and potassium and the variety 'Albik' accumulated magnesium. Biostimulants increased the concentration of phosphorus, magnesium and calcium, and decreased potassium compared to topinambur tubers harvested from the control object. Macronutrient content in tubers of the tested varieties Helianthus tuberosus can be ranked in descending order: potassium > phosphorus > calcium> magnesium. The cultivar 'Albik' was characterized by the highest macro-nutrient uptake capacity. The application of biostimulants increased the uptake of phosphorus, magnesium, calcium and potassium compared to the control. The content and uptake of phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and potassium were influenced by climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubik accumulated the most phosphorus, calcium and potassium.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Material
'Rubik'e0
Outcome
phosphorus, calcium and potassiume0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variety 'Rubik' accumulated the most phosphorus, calcium and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Albik accumulated the most magnesium.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Material
'Albik'e0
Outcome
magnesiume0
Direction
higherinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety 'Albik' accumulated magnesium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“The variety 'Rubik' accumulated the most phosphorus, calcium and potassium and the variety 'Albik' accumulated magnesium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants increased tuber phosphorus, magnesium and calcium concentrations relative to control.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
Biostimulantse0
Outcome
concentration of phosphorus, magnesium and calciume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control objecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biostimulants increased the concentration of phosphorus, magnesium and calcium, and decreased potassium compared to topinambur tubers harvested from the control object”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants decreased tuber potassium concentration relative to control.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
Biostimulantse0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control objecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biostimulants increased the concentration of phosphorus, magnesium and calcium, and decreased potassium compared to topinambur tubers harvested from the control object”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber macronutrient content ranked potassium, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium in descending order.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosuse0
Organ / stage
tuberse0
Outcome
Macronutrient contente0
Direction
descending ordere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macronutrient content in tubers of the tested varieties Helianthus tuberosus can be ranked in descending order: potassium > phosphorus > calcium> magnesium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1257 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Albik had the highest macronutrient uptake capacity.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Material
'Albik'e0
Outcome
macro-nutrient uptake capacitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar 'Albik' was characterized by the highest macro-nutrient uptake capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants increased uptake of phosphorus, magnesium and calcium relative to control.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
uptake of phosphorus, magnesium, calciume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biostimulants increased the uptake of phosphorus, magnesium, calcium and potassium compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants increased potassium uptake relative to control.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biostimulants increased the uptake of phosphorus, magnesium, calcium and potassium compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Climatic conditions influenced tuber macronutrient content and uptake.

Taxon
Helianthus tuberosusHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
climatic conditionse0
Outcome
content and uptake of phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and potassiume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content and uptake of phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and potassium were influenced by climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Helianthus tuberosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–128 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.