Abstract
Jerusalem artichoke tubers are characterized by their high nutritional value and are influenced by various factors, e.g., variety, biostimulant application, and environmental conditions.The aim of the three-year (2021-2023) study was to determine the sodium and aluminum contents and uptake in two Jerusalem artichoke varieties, under the influence of biostimulants B1 (Kaishi), B2 (Maral), B3 (Nutrigreen AD), and B4 (Vanadoo).Elemental analysis was performed using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry.The results showed that both varieties had comparable sodium and aluminum contents.Biostimulant B2 increased the sodium content compared to the control variant, while reducing the aluminum content.Furthermore, the variety Albik exhibited higher sodium uptake and lower aluminum uptake than Rubik.Notably, B2 enhanced the sodium uptake in Albik, whereas B4 was most effective for Rubik.Aluminum uptake decreased in the Albik variety with biostimulant B3, while all biostimulants raised the aluminum uptake in Rubik.The study indicates that biostimulants may beneficially influence the sodium and aluminum content and uptake in Jerusalem artichoke tubers, highlighting the need for further research.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Albik and Rubik had comparable sodium content.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichoke
.jpg?width=60)
Helianthus tuberosust0 - Outcome
- sodiume0
- Direction
- comparablee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“both varieties had comparable sodium and aluminum contents”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
Albik and Rubik had comparable aluminum content.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Outcome
- aluminume0
- Direction
- comparablee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both varieties had comparable sodium and aluminum contents”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
B2 raised sodium content relative to control.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Treatment
- Biostimulant B2e0
- Outcome
- sodium contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Biostimulant B2 increased the sodium content compared to the control variant”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
B2 lowered aluminum content relative to control.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Treatment
- Biostimulant B2e0
- Outcome
- aluminum contente0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Biostimulant B2 increased the sodium content compared to the control variant, while reducing the aluminum content”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
Albik had higher sodium uptake than Rubik.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Material
- Albike0
- Outcome
- sodium uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Rubike0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the variety Albik exhibited higher sodium uptake and lower aluminum uptake than Rubik”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
Albik had lower aluminum uptake than Rubik.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Material
- Albike0
- Outcome
- aluminum uptakee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- Rubike0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the variety Albik exhibited higher sodium uptake and lower aluminum uptake than Rubik”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
B2 enhanced sodium uptake in Albik.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Material
- Albike0
- Treatment
- B2e0
- Outcome
- sodium uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B2 enhanced the sodium uptake in Albik”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
B4 was most effective for sodium uptake in Rubik.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Material
- Rubike0
- Treatment
- B4e0
- Outcome
- sodium uptakee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B2 enhanced the sodium uptake in Albik, whereas B4 was most effective for Rubik”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
B3 decreased aluminum uptake in Albik.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Material
- Albike0
- Treatment
- biostimulant B3e0
- Outcome
- Aluminum uptakee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aluminum uptake decreased in the Albik variety with biostimulant B3”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
Claim · model-written summary
All biostimulants raised aluminum uptake in Rubik.
- Taxon
- Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
- Material
- Rubike0
- Treatment
- all biostimulantse0
- Outcome
- aluminum uptakee0
- Direction
- raisede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all biostimulants raised the aluminum uptake in Rubik”
t0“Jerusalem artichoke”
The same questions in other papers
other · nutrient: content · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
other · molecular: metabolites · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.