Paper · 1999 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

EFFECT OF DELIVERY DELAY ON QUALITY PARAMETERS OF SOME SUGARCANE VARIETIES UNDER DRIP AND SURFACE IRRIGATION

NASER B. AZZAZY; NAGDY A. MOHAMED; IBRAHIM H. EL-GEDDAWY

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This work was carried out in Upper Egypt at El-Mattana Agricultural Research Station, Qena Governorate in two successive sea­sons (1996/1997 and 1997/1998) to study the effect of delivery de­laying processes on quality parameters of some sugar cane vrieties after cutting. Each trail included the combination between two irrigation sys­tems (drip and furrow) and three sugarcane varieties (G.T. 54-9, F. 153 and G.74-97). The results showed that stalk weight losses and reducing sugar percentages of sugar percentages of sugarcane stalks tended to increases as can stalks delivery delayed up to 7 days after cutting. On the contrary, the exracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages de­creased as the period after cane cutting was prolonged. Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems. The highest quality parameters in terms of sucrose and purity were produced under drip irrigation. Reducing sugar percentage was insignificantly affected by irrigation systems. Varietal difference were signifcant in respect to the studied traits. Sugarcane va­riety G.T. 54-9 recorded highest values of extracted juice, brix and puri­ty percentages over the other two varieties. Curve analysis and partial regression analysis indicated that the effect of delivery depends on the quality parameter. In some cases, it was found to be positive (weight losses% and reducing sugar %) in others, it was found to be negative (Purity% and extracted juice%) while in some cases no clear relation was observed, (sucrose % and brix %). In some cases, interaction was exis­tent i.e weight losses% and reducing sugar for stalks. In other cases in­teraction was not existent i.e extracted juice%, sucrose% and purity. The interaction between irrigation systems and sugarcane varieties did not affecte sucrose percentage significantly in both seasons except in the 6th and 7th days in the first season only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The results showed that stalk weight losses and reducing sugar percentages of sugar percentages of sugarcane stalks tended to increases as can stalks delivery delayed up to 7 days after cutting.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
delivery delayed up to 7 days after cuttinge0
Outcome
stalk weight losses and reducing sugar percentagese0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that stalk weight losses and reducing sugar percentages of sugar percentages of sugarcane stalks tended to increases as can stalks delivery delayed up to 7 days after cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On the contrary, the exracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages de­creased as the period after cane cutting was prolonged.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
period after cane cutting was prolongede0
Outcome
exracted juice, sucrose and purity percentagese0
Direction
de­creasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“On the contrary, the exracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages de­creased as the period after cane cutting was prolonged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
Weight lossese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
extracted juicee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
sucrosee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
purity percentagese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Weight losses, extracted juice, sucrose and purity percentages were significantly affect­ed by the irrigation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest quality parameters in terms of sucrose and purity were produced under drip irrigation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
sucrose and puritye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest quality parameters in terms of sucrose and purity were produced under drip irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing sugar percentage was insignificantly affected by irrigation systems.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
Reducing sugar percentagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing sugar percentage was insignificantly affected by irrigation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varietal difference were signifcant in respect to the studied traits.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
Varietale0
Outcome
studied traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Varietal difference were signifcant in respect to the studied traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane va­riety G.T. 54-9 recorded highest values of extracted juice, brix and puri­ty percentages over the other two varieties.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
G.T. 54-9e0
Outcome
extracted juice, brix and puri­ty percentagese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other two varietiese0

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane va­riety G.T. 54-9 recorded highest values of extracted juice, brix and puri­ty percentages over the other two varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some cases, it was found to be positive (weight losses% and reducing sugar %) in others, it was found to be negative (Purity% and extracted juice%) while in some cases no clear relation was observed, (sucrose % and brix %).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
weight losses% and reducing sugar %e0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
deliverye1

Not reportedTreatmentSetting

Verbatim

e0

“In some cases, it was found to be positive (weight losses% and reducing sugar %) in others, it was found to be negative (Purity% and extracted juice%) while in some cases no clear relation was observed, (sucrose % and brix %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“delivery delayed up to 7 days after cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–615 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some cases, it was found to be positive (weight losses% and reducing sugar %) in others, it was found to be negative (Purity% and extracted juice%) while in some cases no clear relation was observed, (sucrose % and brix %).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Purity% and extracted juice%e0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
deliverye1

Not reportedTreatmentSetting

Verbatim

e0

“In some cases, it was found to be positive (weight losses% and reducing sugar %) in others, it was found to be negative (Purity% and extracted juice%) while in some cases no clear relation was observed, (sucrose % and brix %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“delivery delayed up to 7 days after cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–615 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some cases, it was found to be positive (weight losses% and reducing sugar %) in others, it was found to be negative (Purity% and extracted juice%) while in some cases no clear relation was observed, (sucrose % and brix %).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
sucrose % and brix %e0
Qualifier
deliverye1

Not reportedTreatmentSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In some cases, it was found to be positive (weight losses% and reducing sugar %) in others, it was found to be negative (Purity% and extracted juice%) while in some cases no clear relation was observed, (sucrose % and brix %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“delivery delayed up to 7 days after cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–615 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some cases, interaction was exis­tent i.e weight losses% and reducing sugar for stalks.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
weight losses% and reducing sugare0
Direction
exis­tente0
Qualifier
interactione0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“In some cases, interaction was exis­tent i.e weight losses% and reducing sugar for stalks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In other cases in­teraction was not existent i.e extracted juice%, sucrose% and purity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
extracted juice%, sucrose% and puritye0
Direction
not existente0
Qualifier
interactione0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“In other cases in­teraction was not existent i.e extracted juice%, sucrose% and purity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1766 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between irrigation systems and sugarcane varieties did not affecte sucrose percentage significantly in both seasons except in the 6th and 7th days in the first season only.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
sucrose percentagee0
Direction
did not affectee0
Qualifier
interactione0

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between irrigation systems and sugarcane varieties did not affecte sucrose percentage significantly in both seasons except in the 6th and 7th days in the first season only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–64 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.