Abstract
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil seed crop in the world belonging to the Leguminosae family. It is one of the essential food and cash crops of our country. In India, a large number of diseases attack groundnut [1]. Among soil borne diseases, stem rot or white mold caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. [2] is an important disease causing significant yield losses in several groundnut growing countries (Mehan et al., 1994). Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. is a destructive soil borne fungal pathogen of oil seed crop in India. Different practices are recommended for management of groundnut stem rot such as deep summer ploughing, destruction of plant debris, crop rotation with jowar and bajra, seed treatment with carbendazim or captan or mancozeb or tebuconazole, soil drenching with hexaconazole, application of ammonium sulphate or calcium ammonium nitrate instead of urea and application of gypsum at flowering stage. Further, no single treatment is full proof and disease continues to cause losses in farmers’ fields. Biological control offers an interesting alternative to fungicides for sustainable management of soil borne diseases. Biocontrol is a non-chemical measure, could be effective as chemical control by various techniques. Among the techniques, the mixture of antagonists was studied to enchance the control efficacy. In most studies, the involvement of only mechanism of biological control is demonstrated. Involvement of more than one mechanism has been reported in only a few systems. Use of several biocontrol agents with several mechanisms of control fits in well with the concepts of integrated disease management, in which several means of disease suppression are applied concurrently. When single or more means of mechanisms are not effective, the others may compensate for the former absence. The present study, involved three major bacterial antagonists viz., Streptomyces violaceusniger, Streptomyces exfoliatus and Pseudomonas fluorescens to find out the effective dose of mixtures. The different doses from 10-1 to 10-5 were studied, the dose 10-1 of Streptomyces violaceusniger have more efficiency of 86.70, than S. exfoliatus. The efficacy of Streptomyces violaceusniger with combination of other antagonists were tested and found that, the mixture of Streptomyces violaceusniger and P. fluorescens have synergistic activity than any other combinations which have synergistic factor greater than one.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Streptomyces violaceusniger at a 10-1 dose had higher efficiency (86.70) than S. exfoliatus against stem rot.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- dose 10-1 of Streptomyces violaceusnigere2
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen - Second interactor
- Streptomyces violaceusnigerStreptomyces violaceusnigere2biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- efficiencye2
- Direction
- more efficiencye2
- Value
- 86.70e2
- Comparator
- S. exfoliatuse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil seed crop in the world”
e1“stem rot or white mold caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc”
e2“the dose 10-1 of Streptomyces violaceusniger have more efficiency of 86.70, than S. exfoliatus”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture of Streptomyces violaceusniger and Pseudomonas fluorescens had synergistic activity compared with any other combination.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- mixture of Streptomyces violaceusniger and P. fluorescense3
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen - Second interactor
- P. fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescense3biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- synergistic activitye3
- Direction
- synergistice3
- Comparator
- any other combinationse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil seed crop in the world”
e1“stem rot or white mold caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc”
e3“the mixture of Streptomyces violaceusniger and P. fluorescens have synergistic activity than any other combinations which have synergistic factor greater than one”
Claim · model-written summary
Combinations of the antagonists had a synergistic factor greater than one.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Outcome
- synergistic factore3
- Direction
- greater than onee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil seed crop in the world”
e3“the mixture of Streptomyces violaceusniger and P. fluorescens have synergistic activity than any other combinations which have synergistic factor greater than one”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.