Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

Interactive effects of long-term management of crop residue and phosphorus fertilization on wheat productivity and soil health in the rice–wheat

Rajeev Kumar Gupta; Paramjit Kaur Sraw; Jasjit Singh Kang; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
41
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract In the context of degradation of soil health, environmental pollution, and yield stagnation in the rice–wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia, an experiment was established in split plot design to assess the long-term effect of crop residue management on productivity and phosphorus requirement of wheat in rice–wheat system. The experiment comprised of six crop residue management practices as the main treatment factor with three levels (0, 30 and 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 ) of phosphorus fertilizer as sub-treatments. Significant improvement in soil aggregation, bulk density, and infiltration rate was observed under residue management (retention/incorporation) treatments compared to residue removal or residue burning. Soil organic carbon (SOC), available nutrient content (N, P, and K), microbial count, and enzyme activities were also significantly higher in conservation tillage and residue-treated plots than without residue/burning treatments. The residue derived from both crops when was either retained/incorporated improved the soil organic carbon (0.80%) and resulted in a significant increase in SOC (73.9%) in the topsoil layer as compared to the conventional practice. The mean effect studies revealed that crop residue management practices and phosphorus levels significantly influenced wheat yield attributes and productivity. The higher grain yield of wheat was recorded in two treatments, i.e. the basal application of 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 without residue incorporation and the other with half the P-fertilizer (30 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 ) with rice residue only. The grain yield of wheat where the rice and wheat residue were either retained/incorporated without phosphorus application was at par with 30 and 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 . Phosphorus levels also significantly affected wheat productivity and available P content in the soil. Therefore, results suggested that crop residue retention following the conservation tillage approach improved the yield of wheat cultivated in the rice–wheat cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue management significantly improved soil aggregation, bulk density, and infiltration rate.

Treatment
residue management (retention/incorporation)e0
Outcome
soil aggregation, bulk density, and infiltration ratee0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
residue removal or residue burninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvement in soil aggregation, bulk density, and infiltration rate was observed under residue management (retention/incorporation) treatments compared to residue removal or residue burning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon, available nutrients, and microbial count were higher under conservation tillage and residue treatment.

Treatment
conservation tillage and residue-treated plotse0
Outcome
Soil organic carbon (SOC), available nutrient content (N, P, and K), microbial counte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
without residue/burning treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon (SOC), available nutrient content (N, P, and K), microbial count, and enzyme activities were also significantly higher in conservation tillage and residue-treated plots than without residue/burning treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil enzyme activities were higher under conservation tillage and residue treatment.

Treatment
conservation tillage and residue-treated plotse0
Outcome
enzyme activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
without residue/burning treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon (SOC), available nutrient content (N, P, and K), microbial count, and enzyme activities were also significantly higher in conservation tillage and residue-treated plots than without residue/burning treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Retained or incorporated residue increased topsoil organic carbon by 73.9% compared with conventional practice.

Treatment
retained/incorporatede0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
improvede0
Value
73.9%e0
Qualifier
0.80%e0
Comparator
the conventional practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residue derived from both crops when was either retained/incorporated improved the soil organic carbon (0.80%) and resulted in a significant increase in SOC (73.9%) in the topsoil layer as compared to the conventional practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue management and phosphorus levels significantly influenced wheat yield attributes and productivity.

Treatment
crop residue management practices and phosphorus levelse0
Outcome
wheat yield attributes and productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean effect studies revealed that crop residue management practices and phosphorus levels significantly influenced wheat yield attributes and productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher wheat grain yield occurred with 60 kg phosphorus fertilizer without residue incorporation.

Treatment
basal application of 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 without residue incorporatione0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher grain yield of wheat was recorded in two treatments, i.e. the basal application of 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 without residue incorporation and the other with half the P-fertilizer (30 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 ) with rice residue only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher wheat grain yield occurred with 30 kg phosphorus fertilizer and rice residue.

Treatment
30 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 ) with rice residue onlye0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher grain yield of wheat was recorded in two treatments, i.e. the basal application of 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 without residue incorporation and the other with half the P-fertilizer (30 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 ) with rice residue only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield with retained or incorporated residues and no phosphorus was comparable to yields with 30 and 60 kg fertilizer.

Treatment
rice and wheat residue were either retained/incorporated without phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
30 and 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield of wheat where the rice and wheat residue were either retained/incorporated without phosphorus application was at par with 30 and 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha –1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1767 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels significantly affected wheat productivity.

Treatment
Phosphorus levelse0
Outcome
wheat productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus levels also significantly affected wheat productivity and available P content in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels significantly affected available soil phosphorus.

Treatment
Phosphorus levelse0
Outcome
available P content in the soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus levels also significantly affected wheat productivity and available P content in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue retention with conservation tillage improved wheat yield.

Treatment
crop residue retention following the conservation tillage approache0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop residue retention following the conservation tillage approach improved the yield of wheat cultivated in the rice–wheat cropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2044 · show in text ↑
t0

“on wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–110 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

tillage · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.