Abstract
The experiment was carried out in the Saran-covered nursery of the Department of Horticulture and Landscaping - College of Agriculture and Marshes at Dhi Qar University during the growing season (2021-2022). One-year-old citrus seedlings were obtained as homogeneous in growth as possible from one of the Baghdad governorate nurseries on February 20. \2022 The seedlings were transferred to plastic pots with a capacity of 10 kg (26 cm diameter) filled with an agricultural medium consisting of mixed soil and moss in a ratio of 1:3. The process of servicing the plants was carried out in a similar way, such as pruning, hoeing, fertilizing and irrigation throughout the study period, the study was carried out as a two-factor experiment using the design of sectors Complete Randomization (R.C.B.D)‚ The first factor represented the spraying with Ferti Mar compound at four concentrations (1.5,1,0.5,0) ml per liter-1 and the second factor spraying with the GROWX AMINO MIX compound at four concentrations (0, 1, 2, 3) g per liter-1, and it was sprayed at a rate of three sprays Between one spray and another two weeks, and the results of the study can be summarized as follows: Ferti mar spraying treatments showed a positive effect on most chemical indicators of citrus seedlings. The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.Spraying treatments with Growx amino mix showed a positive effect on most of the chemical indicators of citrus seedlings. The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.The interaction treatments between the two factors of the study gave a positive significant effect in most of the studied chemical characteristics. The interaction treatment between the concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 of ertimar and 3 gm L-1 Growx amino mix recorded the best significant results for growth indicators.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantium
Citrus ×aurantiumt0 - Treatment
- 1.5 ml L-1e0
- Outcome
- total chlorophylle0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weighte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 1.5 ml L-1e0
- Outcome
- carbohydratese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 11.260%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 1.5 ml L-1e0
- Outcome
- nitrogene0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.83%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 1.5 ml L-1e0
- Outcome
- phosphorouse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.24%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 1.5 ml L-1e0
- Outcome
- potassiume0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.98%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 significantly outperformed by registering the highest rate for the character and content of leaves from total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and content of leaves from elements The nutritional value of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium was 59.89 mg, 100 g-1 fresh weight, 11.260%, 1.83%, 0.24%, and 1.98%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 3 gm l-1e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll in leavese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mwe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 3 gm l-1e0
- Outcome
- carbohydrate percentage in leavese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 11.361%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 3 gm l-1e0
- Outcome
- nitrogene0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.80%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 3 gm l-1e0
- Outcome
- phosphorouse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.24%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 3 gm l-1e0
- Outcome
- potassiume0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.89%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spraying treatment with a concentration of 3 gm l-1 was superior by recording the highest rate of chlorophyll in leaves, carbohydrate percentage in leaves and leaf content of nutrients nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, which amounted to 59 .88 mg 100 g-1 mw, 11.361%, 1.80%, 0.24%, 1.89%, respectively.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction treatment between the concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 of ertimar and 3 gm L-1 Growx amino mix recorded the best significant results for growth indicators.
- Taxon
- Citrus aurantiumCitrus ×aurantiumt0
- Treatment
- 1.5 ml L-1 of ertimar and 3 gm L-1 Growx amino mixe0
- Outcome
- growth indicatorse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction treatment between the concentration of 1.5 ml L-1 of ertimar and 3 gm L-1 Growx amino mix recorded the best significant results for growth indicators.”
t0“Citrus aurantium seedlings”
The same questions in other papers
primary amino group · growth · Citrus x aurantium (sour orange)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
transgenic · quality: sugar starch · Citrus x aurantium (sour orange)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
transgenic · nutrient: content · Citrus x aurantium (sour orange)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
transgenic · growth · Citrus x aurantium (sour orange)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
transgenic · physiology: pigments · Citrus x aurantium (sour orange)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.