Paper · 2023 · Agronomy Journal of Nepal

Yield and Seed Quality of Wheat as Affected by Seeding Dates and Boron Levels at Rampur, Chitwan

Bishwo B. Chhetri; Shrawan K. Sah; Santosh Marahatta; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Yield and seed quality of wheat is affected by sowing dates through its impacts on growing environment, soil moisture content and terminal heat stress. Boron fertilization also impacts on number of seed per spike and quality of the seed. A field experiment was laid out in split-plot design with four sowing dates (15 November, 30 November, 15 December and 30 December) in main plot and four boron levels (0, 1, 2 and 3 kg ha-1) on sub-plot, replicated thrice to assess the effect of sowing dates and boron levels on yield and seed quality of wheat at Rampur, Chitwan during winter season of 2019. The results revealed that significantly highest grain yield was obtained on November sown wheat compared to December sowing. Highest grain yield was obtained with the application of boron at 3 kg ha-1, significantly higher than 0 and 1 kg ha-1 boron application. Significant interaction among sowing dates and boron levels was found on grain and seed yield. Seed quality parameters viz; seedling root and shoot length, vigour indices I and II were better in the earlier sown wheat and with 3 kg ha-1 boron application. The germination was also higher in earlier sown wheat but not affected by boron levels. Therefore, wheat with high seed quality can be sown from 15 to 30 November with 3 kg ha-1boron application in Chitwan and under similar environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

November sowing produced significantly higher grain yield than December sowing.

Treatment
November sowne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
December sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest grain yield was obtained on November sown wheat compared to December sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron at 3 kg ha-1 produced higher grain yield than 0 and 1 kg ha-1.

Treatment
boron at 3 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
0 and 1 kg ha-1 boron applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield was obtained with the application of boron at 3 kg ha-1, significantly higher than 0 and 1 kg ha-1 boron application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date and boron level interacted significantly for grain and seed yield.

Treatment
sowing dates and boron levelse0
Outcome
grain and seed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interaction among sowing dates and boron levels was found on grain and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier sowing improved seedling root and shoot length and vigour indices I and II.

Treatment
earlier sowne0
Outcome
seedling root and shoot length, vigour indices I and IIe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed quality parameters viz; seedling root and shoot length, vigour indices I and II were better in the earlier sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron at 3 kg ha-1 improved seedling root and shoot length and vigour indices I and II.

Treatment
3 kg ha-1 boron applicatione0
Outcome
seedling root and shoot length, vigour indices I and IIe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed quality parameters viz; seedling root and shoot length, vigour indices I and II were better in the earlier sown wheat and with 3 kg ha-1 boron application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier sowing increased germination.

Treatment
earlier sowne0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination was also higher in earlier sown wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron level did not affect germination.

Treatment
boron levelse0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination was also higher in earlier sown wheat but not affected by boron levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1203 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sowing wheat from 15 to 30 November with 3 kg ha-1 boron in Chitwan or similar environments for high seed quality.

Treatment
15 to 30 November with 3 kg ha-1boron applicatione0
Outcome
high seed qualitye0
Setting
Chitwane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat with high seed quality can be sown from 15 to 30 November with 3 kg ha-1boron application in Chitwan and under similar environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1353 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

37 papers: 20 positive, 17 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.