Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of different sources of phosphorus with and without PSB on soil properties, growth, yield, quality and nutrient content in green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

More Gouri; Sawant Pooja; Khobragade N; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine the effect of different sources of phosphorus on soil properties, growth, yield, quality and nutrient content in green gram (Vigna radiata L.) in the soil at Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Dapoli during Summer season of 2022 in Randomized Blok Design comprising eight treatments replicated thrice. It was found from the study that the growth parameters, yield contributing characters, seed and Stover yield, quality parameter viz., protein content, nutrient content and uptake had recorded the highest favourable parameters and there was a significant increase in soil organic carbon, available macronutrients (N, P and K), micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) contents and optimum net return with good B:C ratio, with the application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea), followed by the application of N (100%) through Urea and P2O5 (100%) through SSP. Thus, the effectiveness of P fertilizers with regard to seed yield follow the order: DAP > SSP > RP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP gave the highest growth parameters, yield contributing characters and seed and Stover yield of green gram.

Treatment
application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)e1
Outcome
growth parameters, yield contributing characters, seed and Stover yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growth parameters, yield contributing characters, seed and Stover yield, quality parameter viz., protein content, nutrient content and uptake had recorded the highest favourable parameters and there was a significant increase in soil organic carbon, available macronutrients (N, P and K), micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) contents and optimum net return with good B:C ratio, with the application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP gave the highest protein content, nutrient content and uptake in green gram.

Treatment
application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)e1
Outcome
protein content, nutrient content and uptakee1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growth parameters, yield contributing characters, seed and Stover yield, quality parameter viz., protein content, nutrient content and uptake had recorded the highest favourable parameters and there was a significant increase in soil organic carbon, available macronutrients (N, P and K), micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) contents and optimum net return with good B:C ratio, with the application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP significantly increased soil organic carbon and available macronutrients (N, P, K).

Treatment
application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)e1
Outcome
soil organic carbon, available macronutrients (N, P and K)e1
Direction
significant increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growth parameters, yield contributing characters, seed and Stover yield, quality parameter viz., protein content, nutrient content and uptake had recorded the highest favourable parameters and there was a significant increase in soil organic carbon, available macronutrients (N, P and K), micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) contents and optimum net return with good B:C ratio, with the application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP significantly increased soil micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu).

Treatment
application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)e1
Outcome
micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) contentse1
Direction
significant increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growth parameters, yield contributing characters, seed and Stover yield, quality parameter viz., protein content, nutrient content and uptake had recorded the highest favourable parameters and there was a significant increase in soil organic carbon, available macronutrients (N, P and K), micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) contents and optimum net return with good B:C ratio, with the application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP gave optimum net return with good B:C ratio.

Treatment
application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)e1
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
optimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growth parameters, yield contributing characters, seed and Stover yield, quality parameter viz., protein content, nutrient content and uptake had recorded the highest favourable parameters and there was a significant increase in soil organic carbon, available macronutrients (N, P and K), micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) contents and optimum net return with good B:C ratio, with the application of 80% N and 100% P2O5 through DAP (with 20% N through Urea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effectiveness of P fertilizers for seed yield followed the order DAP > SSP > RP.

Treatment
P fertilizerse1
Outcome
effectiveness of P fertilizers with regard to seed yielde1
Direction
DAP > SSP > RPe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effectiveness of P fertilizers with regard to seed yield follow the order: DAP > SSP > RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–159 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    FYM enhanced following mungbean N and P uptake.

    Integrated nutrient management in wheat (Triticum aestivum) mungbeail (Phaseolus radiatus) cropping sequence in arid region · 2001 · compared with the control and 90 kg Nlha

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.