Paper · 2012 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Performance of green gram and dry season rice in arsenic uptake under different management options in West Bengal

Sanjoy Mondal; P. Bandopadhyay; Sudhir Pal

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of irrigation sources viz. shallow tube well irrigation (STW) and harvested pond water irrigation (PW) and nutrient sources (100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), 100% RDF with elevated phosphate (double dose of recommended), 75%RDF +FYM@ 10t ha−1, 75%RDF + FYM@ 10t ha−1 with elevated phosphate] on yield and accumulation and uptake of arsenic by green gram and rice in dry season were investigated during 2007–08 and 2008–09. PW led to higher grain and straw yield in rice, as compared to STW, while, no significant difference was observed in green gram. Application of 75%RDF+FYM@10 t ha−1 with elevated phosphate favoured yield of both the crops. The arsenic accumulation was much higher in summer rice compared to green gram. Accumulation and uptake was much lower with pw, compared to STW 75%RDF + FYM @ 10t ha−1 with elevated phosphate proved to be the best in reducing arsenic accumulation in both the crops

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pond water increased rice grain and straw yield relative to shallow tube well irrigation.

Treatment
PWe0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
STWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PW led to higher grain and straw yield in rice, as compared to STW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation comparison showed no significant yield difference in green gram.

Treatment
PWe0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Comparator
STWe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PW led to higher grain and straw yield in rice, as compared to STW, while, no significant difference was observed in green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer plus manure with elevated phosphate favored green gram yield.

Treatment
75%RDF+FYM@10 t ha−1 with elevated phosphatee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75%RDF+FYM@10 t ha−1 with elevated phosphate favoured yield of both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer plus manure with elevated phosphate favored rice yield.

Treatment
75%RDF+FYM@10 t ha−1 with elevated phosphatee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75%RDF+FYM@10 t ha−1 with elevated phosphate favoured yield of both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer rice accumulated more arsenic than green gram.

Outcome
arsenic accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
green grame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The arsenic accumulation was much higher in summer rice compared to green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pond water lowered green gram arsenic accumulation and uptake relative to STW.

Treatment
pwe0
Outcome
Accumulation and uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
STWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulation and uptake was much lower with pw, compared to STW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pond water lowered rice arsenic accumulation and uptake relative to STW.

Treatment
pwe0
Outcome
Accumulation and uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
STWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulation and uptake was much lower with pw, compared to STW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer plus manure with elevated phosphate was best at reducing green gram arsenic accumulation.

Treatment
75%RDF + FYM @ 10t ha−1 with elevated phosphatee0
Outcome
arsenic accumulatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75%RDF + FYM @ 10t ha−1 with elevated phosphate proved to be the best in reducing arsenic accumulation in both the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer plus manure with elevated phosphate was best at reducing rice arsenic accumulation.

Treatment
75%RDF + FYM @ 10t ha−1 with elevated phosphatee0
Outcome
arsenic accumulatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75%RDF + FYM @ 10t ha−1 with elevated phosphate proved to be the best in reducing arsenic accumulation in both the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

418 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.