Abstract
Jasmonic Acid (JA) and Salicylic Acid (SA) are pivotal signaling molecules involved in the complex network of plant defense mechanisms. Enhancing the levels of JA and SA through exogenous application or genetic manipulation has shown promising results in bolstering plant resistance to a wide range of diseases. This study investigates the effects of JA, SA and Compost Tea (CT) treatments on the endogenous JA and SA responses of four distinct potato genotypes-KH (Kufri Himalini, Solanum tuberosum), KJ (Kufri Jyothi, Solanum tuberosum), AC4 (Solanum sparsipillium) and AC6 (Solanum spegzinii). High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis was conducted to determine endogenous detectable levels of JA and SA defence phytohormones. The absorption spectra showed peak absorptions at 295 nm and 325 nm for JA (25 µg ml-1) and SA (10 µg ml-1) respectively. Retention times of JA and SA were determined to be RT-3.74 and RT-2.86 min respectively. The genotypes were subjected to various concentrations of JA and SA, and their respective impacts on endogenous JA and SA were measured. Genotype-specific responses were evident, with all genotypes displaying distinct sensitivities with respect to endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments while no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments. JA could enhance higher amount of detectable endogenous JA than CT treatment. The application of JA and SA enhancement could demonstrate success in various other crops rendering resistance against diseases in an eco-friendly approach.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
In Compost Tea, potato genotype KH had 15.42 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume0 - Material
- KHe2
- Treatment
- Compost Tea (CT)e1
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 15.42 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e1“the effects of JA, SA and Compost Tea (CT) treatments”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
In Compost Tea, potato genotype KJ had 133.67 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Material
- KJe2
- Treatment
- Compost Tea (CT)e1
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 133.67 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e1“the effects of JA, SA and Compost Tea (CT) treatments”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
In Compost Tea, potato genotype AC4 had 10.36 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Material
- AC4e2
- Treatment
- Compost Tea (CT)e1
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 10.36 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e1“the effects of JA, SA and Compost Tea (CT) treatments”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
In Compost Tea, potato genotype AC6 had 7.92 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Material
- AC6e2
- Treatment
- Compost Tea (CT)e1
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 7.92 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e1“the effects of JA, SA and Compost Tea (CT) treatments”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
JA treatment gave potato genotype KH 83.03 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Material
- KHe2
- Treatment
- JAe2
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 83.03 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
JA treatment gave potato genotype KJ 184.14 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Material
- KJe2
- Treatment
- JAe2
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 184.14 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
JA treatment gave potato genotype AC4 286.95 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Material
- AC4e2
- Treatment
- JAe2
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 286.95 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
JA treatment gave potato genotype AC6 9.2 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Material
- AC6e2
- Treatment
- JAe2
- Outcome
- endogenous detectable JAe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 9.2 µg ml-1e2
- Comparator
- Controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e2“endogenous detectable JA in CT (KH-15.42 µg ml-1, KJ-133.67 µg ml-1, AC4-10.36 µg ml-1, AC6-7.92 µg ml-1), JA (KH-83.03 µg ml-1, KJ-184.14 µg ml-1, AC4-286.95 µg ml-1, AC6-9.2 µg ml-1) treatments”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
No detectable JA or SA was observed in the control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments of potato genotypes.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Outcome
- detectable JA and SAe3
- Qualifier
- Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e3“no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
JA treatment enhanced endogenous detectable JA more than Compost Tea did in potato.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Treatment
- JAe6
- Outcome
- detectable endogenous JAe6
- Direction
- highere6
- Comparator
- CT treatmente6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e6“JA could enhance higher amount of detectable endogenous JA than CT treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The JA absorption spectrum showed a peak at 295 nm.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Outcome
- peak absorptionse4
- Value
- 295 nme4
- Qualifier
- for JA (25 µg ml-1)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e4“The absorption spectra showed peak absorptions at 295 nm and 325 nm for JA (25 µg ml-1) and SA (10 µg ml-1) respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The SA absorption spectrum showed a peak at 325 nm.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Outcome
- peak absorptionse4
- Value
- 325 nme4
- Qualifier
- SA (10 µg ml-1)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e4“The absorption spectra showed peak absorptions at 295 nm and 325 nm for JA (25 µg ml-1) and SA (10 µg ml-1) respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The JA retention time under the HPLC conditions was 3.74 min.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Outcome
- Retention times of JAe5
- Value
- RT-3.74e5
- Qualifier
- JAe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e5“Retention times of JA and SA were determined to be RT-3.74 and RT-2.86 min respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The SA retention time under the HPLC conditions was 2.86 min.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Outcome
- Retention times of JA and SAe5
- Value
- RT-2.86e5
- Qualifier
- SAe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four distinct potato genotypes”
e5“Retention times of JA and SA were determined to be RT-3.74 and RT-2.86 min respectively”
The same questions in other papers
jasmonic acid · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.