Paper · 2024 · Food Chemistry

Sustainable cultivation of melon landraces: Effects of grafting on the accumulation of flavor-related compounds

A. Flores-León; R. Martí; M. Valcarcel; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Melon landraces are highly appreciated by consumers who pay price premiums to compensate for lower yields, enabling on-farm conservation. However, they are highly susceptible to soilborne diseases. This study analyses the impact of Cucurbita and Cucumis rootstocks on the accumulation of flavor-related metabolites in Spanish landraces of the Ibericus melon group, as a strategy to promote their sustainable cultivation. Scion genotype was the main factor conditioning the accumulation of sugars and acids both under standard and saline organic farming conditions. The effects of grafting on organic acid accumulation were negligible, while the effects on sugar content were significant. The latter effects were dependent on specific scion-rootstock combinations, though wild Cucumis (e.g. Fian) rootstocks represent an alternative that should be further studied. The effect on the accumulation of volatiles was limited, and again depended on specific scion-rootstock combinations. The rootstock effect even differed between populations of the same landrace.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scion genotype was the main factor affecting sugar accumulation across standard and saline organic farming.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
Scion genotypee0
Outcome
accumulation of sugarse0
Setting
standard and saline organic farming conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Scion genotype was the main factor conditioning the accumulation of sugars and acids both under standard and saline organic farming conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–563 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scion genotype was the main factor affecting acid accumulation across standard and saline organic farming.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
Scion genotypee0
Outcome
acidse0
Setting
standard and saline organic farming conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Scion genotype was the main factor conditioning the accumulation of sugars and acids both under standard and saline organic farming conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting had negligible effects on organic acid accumulation.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
organic acid accumulatione0
Direction
negligiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effects of grafting on organic acid accumulation were negligible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting significantly affected sugar content, depending on scion-rootstock combination.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftinge1
Outcome
sugar contente0
Qualifier
specific scion-rootstock combinationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“the effects on sugar content were significant. The latter effects were dependent on specific scion-rootstock combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of grafting on organic acid accumulation were negligible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting had a limited effect on volatiles, dependent on scion-rootstock combination.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftinge1
Outcome
accumulation of volatilese0
Direction
limitede0
Qualifier
specific scion-rootstock combinationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect on the accumulation of volatiles was limited, and again depended on specific scion-rootstock combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of grafting on organic acid accumulation were negligible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–633 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock effects differed between populations of the same landrace.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
same landracee0
Outcome
rootstock effecte0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The rootstock effect even differed between populations of the same landrace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1057 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest further study of wild Cucumis rootstocks as an alternative.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
wild Cucumis (e.g. Fian) rootstocks represent an alternative that should be further studiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“wild Cucumis (e.g. Fian) rootstocks represent an alternative that should be further studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–862 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

19 papers: 9 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.