Paper · 2024 · Applied Soil Ecology

Cultivar governs plant response to inoculation with single isolates and the microbiome associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Cristina Rotoni; Marcio F.A. Leite; Lina C. Wong; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes (PGPM) have the potential to enhance sustainable agriculture, but there is still a limited understanding of how the complex interplay between plant genetic variability, the native soil community, and soil nutrients affects PGPM recruitment. To address this challenge, we investigated the impact of bacteria isolates and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) along with their accompany microbiome (AMFc) derived from a wild chrysanthemum on the growth of five different commercial chrysanthemum cultivars (Chic, Chic 45, Chic Cream, Haydar and Barolo), as well as their rhizosphere microbiomes, within a nutrient-rich complex substrate environment. We found 23 bacterial strains capable of producing siderophore, 14 strains capable of producing Indole-3-acetic acid, and 18 strains capable of solubilizing phosphate. The AMFc had six AMF species, and the bacterial and fungal communities associated with AMF belonged to different phyla. Using generalized joint models, we investigated the impact of the three most effective bacterial strains and the AMFc on plant growth (shoot and root dry mass) while integrating information on plant genotype, environment, and microbes. The impact of PGPM inoculation varied from positive to negative effects depending on the cultivar, with Chic Cream showing the highest increase in root biomass after inoculation with both bacterial strain SMF006 (57 %) and AMFc inoculation (79 %). Our study demonstrates that PGPM from wild relative can impact the growth and assembly of the chrysanthemum root microbiome, but this impact is cultivar-dependent. Furthermore, inoculation with a complex AMF containing community (AMFc) induced greater changes in the rhizosphere microbiome than with a single bacterial isolate. Our study shows that inoculation of a complex community of beneficial microbes results in more effective plant growth promotion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-three bacterial strains produced siderophore.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Outcome
bacterial strains capable of producing siderophoree0
Value
23 bacterial strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found 23 bacterial strains capable of producing siderophore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen bacterial strains produced Indole-3-acetic acid.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Outcome
strains capable of producing Indole-3-acetic acide0
Value
14 strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“14 strains capable of producing Indole-3-acetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighteen bacterial strains solubilized phosphate.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Outcome
strains capable of solubilizing phosphatee0
Value
18 strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“18 strains capable of solubilizing phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AMFc contained six AMF species.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF speciese0
Value
six AMF speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AMFc had six AMF species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-associated bacterial and fungal communities belonged to different phyla.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
belonged to different phylae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bacterial and fungal communities associated with AMF belonged to different phyla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth effect of PGPM inoculation ranged from positive to negative depending on cultivar.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Material
cultivare0
Treatment
PGPM inoculatione0
Outcome
impact of PGPM inoculatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The impact of PGPM inoculation varied from positive to negative effects depending on the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMF006 inoculation increased root biomass in Chic Cream by 57%.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Material
Chic Creame0
Treatment
inoculation with both bacterial strain SMF006e0
Interactor
bacterial strain SMF006e0symbiont
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
57 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chic Cream showing the highest increase in root biomass after inoculation with both bacterial strain SMF006 (57 %) and AMFc inoculation (79 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1447 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMFc inoculation increased root biomass in Chic Cream by 79%.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Material
Chic Creame0
Treatment
AMFc inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFce0symbiont
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
79 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chic Cream showing the highest increase in root biomass after inoculation with both bacterial strain SMF006 (57 %) and AMFc inoculation (79 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1447 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPM from a wild relative changed chrysanthemum root microbiome assembly in a cultivar-dependent way.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
PGPM from wild relativee0
Outcome
assembly of the chrysanthemum root microbiomee0
Qualifier
cultivar-dependente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPM from wild relative can impact the growth and assembly of the chrysanthemum root microbiome, but this impact is cultivar-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMFc inoculation changed the rhizosphere microbiome more than a single bacterial isolate.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Treatment
inoculation with a complex AMF containing community (AMFc)e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
changes in the rhizosphere microbiomee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
a single bacterial isolatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with a complex AMF containing community (AMFc) induced greater changes in the rhizosphere microbiome than with a single bacterial isolate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1775 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A complex beneficial microbe community promoted plant growth more effectively.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
Treatment
inoculation of a complex community of beneficial microbese0
Outcome
plant growth promotione0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of a complex community of beneficial microbes results in more effective plant growth promotion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1904 · show in text ↑
e1

“commercial chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–532 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.