Paper · 2010 · Journal of Ornamental Horticulture

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and flowering of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev.)

Geeta Pandey; Santosh Kumar; Ajit Kumar

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during 2008-2010on chrysanthemum to ascertain the influence of bio-inoculant (Azotobacter and VAM) and vermicompost with different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (100%, 75% and 50%) on growth and flowering of chrysanthemum cultivars ‘Prof. Harris’ and ‘Sunil’. Cultivar Prof. Harris performed significantly better over cv. Sunil for leaf count, number of lateral shoots, plant spread, days to visible bud formation, days to bud showing colour and flowering. However, plant height, leaf area and flowering duration was maximum in cv. Sunil. Application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizer and vermicompost coupled with dual inoculation of Azotobacter and VAM produced significantly tall plant, higher number of lateral shoots, greater plant spread, advancement in visible bud formation, bud showing colour and flowering, respectively and extension of flowering durationover 100% recommended dose of fertilizer. Leaf count was maximum with application of 75% dose of N + Azotobacter+ VAM + full P and K while, significantly higher leaf area was observed when crop was fertilized with 75% dose of N and P+ Azotobacter + VAM + full K compared with 100% recommended dose of fertilizer and other treatment under investigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prof. Harris exceeded Sunil in leaf count, lateral shoots and plant spread.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Prof. Harrise0
Outcome
leaf count, number of lateral shoots, plant spreade0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Sunile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar Prof. Harris performed significantly better over cv. Sunil for leaf count, number of lateral shoots, plant spread”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prof. Harris performed better than Sunil for timing of bud formation, bud colour and flowering.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Prof. Harrise1
Outcome
days to visible bud formation, days to bud showing colour and floweringe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days to visible bud formation, days to bud showing colour and flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivar Prof. Harris performed significantly better over cv. Sunil for leaf count, number of lateral shoots, plant spread”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunil had maximum height, leaf area and flowering duration.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Sunile0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area and flowering duratione0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, leaf area and flowering duration was maximum in cv. Sunil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 75% fertilizer, vermicompost and dual inoculation treatment improved height, shoots, spread, flowering timing and duration over full fertilizer.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
75% recommended dose of fertilizer and vermicompost coupled with dual inoculation of Azotobacter and VAMe0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
tall plant, higher number of lateral shoots, greater plant spreade0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% recommended dose of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizer and vermicompost coupled with dual inoculation of Azotobacter and VAM produced significantly tall plant, higher number of lateral shoots, greater plant spread, advancement in visible bud formation, bud showing colour and flowering, respectively and extension of flowering durationover 100% recommended dose of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf count was greatest under 75% N with Azotobacter, VAM and full P and K.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
75% dose of N + Azotobacter+ VAM + full P and Ke0
Outcome
Leaf counte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf count was maximum with application of 75% dose of N + Azotobacter+ VAM + full P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area was higher with 75% N and P, inoculants and full K than with full fertilizer and other treatments.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
75% dose of N and P+ Azotobacter + VAM + full Ke0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% recommended dose of fertilizer and other treatment under investigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher leaf area was observed when crop was fertilized with 75% dose of N and P+ Azotobacter + VAM + full K compared with 100% recommended dose of fertilizer and other treatment under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–81 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.