Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold

Praveen Ranadev; Vasantha Kumari R; J. Raghavendra

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drawbacks of intensive farming practices, environmental hazards and costs of chemical fertilizers have renewed interest in bio-inoculants. Microorganisms playing an important role in improving the plant growth and yield are generally referred as beneficial microbes or plant growth promoting rhizo-microorganisms (PGPR). The investigation was carried out in green house at Department of Agricultural Microbiology, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru during 2016-17 in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three replications and nine treatments. The observations were taken at 30, 60, 90 days after transplanting and at harvest. The treatment received 75% N & P + 100% K + Azotobacter isolate (PGPR-24) @ 2kg/ha + Bacillus isolate (PGPR-9) @ 2kg/ha recorded significantly highest plant height (41.74 cm), number of branches (8.33/plant), number of leaves (136.33/plant), plant spread (798.27 cm2), number of suckers (11.67), total dry weight (88.50g/plant) accumulation; yield attributes such as number of flowers (26.33 per plant) and flower weight (101.90g/plant). The native isolates (Azotobacter spp. and Bacillus sp.) performed well in compare with control as well as reference strains in both single and dual inoculated treatments may be because of positive interaction between plant and native isolates and may be the rhizospheric effect of chrysanthemum on native isolates was good in compare to reference strains

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined native inoculants and fertilizer treatment gave the highest plant height of 41.74 cm.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
75% N & P + 100% K + Azotobacter isolate (PGPR-24) @ 2kg/ha + Bacillus isolate (PGPR-9) @ 2kg/hae0
Interactor
Azotobacter isolate (PGPR-24)e0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus isolate (PGPR-9)e0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.74 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment received 75% N & P + 100% K + Azotobacter isolate (PGPR-24) @ 2kg/ha + Bacillus isolate (PGPR-9) @ 2kg/ha recorded significantly highest plant height (41.74 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculant treatment gave the highest branch count of 8.33 per plant.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Value
8.33/plante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of branches (8.33/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculant treatment gave the highest leaf count of 136.33 per plant.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
136.33/plante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves (136.33/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculant treatment gave the highest plant spread of 798.27 cm2.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
plant spreade0
Value
798.27 cm2e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant spread (798.27 cm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculant treatment gave the highest sucker count of 11.67.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
number of suckerse0
Value
11.67e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of suckers (11.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculant treatment gave the highest dry weight of 88.50g/plant.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Value
88.50g/plante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total dry weight (88.50g/plant) accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculant treatment gave the highest flower count of 26.33 per plant.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
number of flowerse0
Value
26.33 per plante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of flowers (26.33 per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculant treatment gave the highest flower weight of 101.90g/plant.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
flower weighte0
Value
101.90g/plante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flower weight (101.90g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native Azotobacter and Bacillus isolates performed better than control and reference strains in single and dual inoculations.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
single and dual inoculated treatmentse0
Interactor
Azotobacter spp.Azotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
performed welle0
Comparator
control as well as reference strainse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The native isolates (Azotobacter spp. and Bacillus sp.) performed well in compare with control as well as reference strains in both single and dual inoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction effect of bio-inoculants on modulating growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora) cv. yellow gold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.