Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Assessing corn recovery from early season nutrient stress under different soil moisture regimes

Solomon Amissah; Godfred Ankomah; Robert D. Lee; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Corn ( Zea mays ) biomass accumulation and nutrient uptake by the six-leaf collar (V6) growth stage are low, and therefore, synchronizing nutrient supply with crop demand could potentially minimize nutrient loss and improve nutrient use efficiency. Knowledge of corn’s response to nutrient stress in the early growth stages could inform such nutrient management. Field studies were conducted to assess corn recovery from when no fertilizer application is made until the V6 growth stage, and thereafter, applying fertilizer rates as those in non-stressed conditions. The early season nutrient stress and non-stress conditions received the same amount of nutrients. As the availability of nutrients for plant uptake is largely dependent on soil moisture, corn recovery from the early season nutrient stress was assessed under different soil moisture regimes induced via irrigation scheduling at 50% and 80% field capacity under overhead and subsurface drip irrigation (SSDI) systems. Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) was the previous crop under all conditions, and the fields were under cereal rye ( Secale cereale ) cover crop prior to planting corn. At the V6 growth stage, the nutrient concentrations of the early season-stressed crops, except for copper, were above the minimum threshold of sufficiency ranges reported for corn. However, the crops showed poor growth, with biomass accumulation being reduced by over 50% compared to non-stressed crops. Also, the uptake of all nutrients was significantly lower under the early season nutrient stress conditions. The recovery of corn from the early season nutrient stress was low. Compared to non-stress conditions, the early season nutrient stress caused 1.58 Mg ha -1 to 3.4 Mg ha -1 yield reduction. The percent yield reduction under the SSDI system was 37.6-38.2% and that under the overhead irrigation system was 11.7-13%. The high yield reduction from the early season nutrient stress under the SSDI system was because of water stress conditions in the topsoil soil layer. The findings of the study suggest ample nutrient supply in the early season growth stage is critical for corn production, and thus, further studies are recommended to determine the optimum nutrient supply for corn at the initial growth stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At V6, most nutrients in stressed corn remained above sufficiency thresholds except copper.

Organ / stage
V6e2
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse0
Direction
abovee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient concentrations of the early season-stressed crops, except for copper, were above the minimum threshold of sufficiency ranges reported for corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
e2

“At the V6 growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nutrient stress reduced biomass accumulation by more than 50%.

Treatment
early season nutrient stresse2
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
over 50%e0
Comparator
non-stressed cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biomass accumulation being reduced by over 50% compared to non-stressed crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to non-stress conditions, the early season nutrient stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All nutrient uptake was significantly lower under early nutrient stress.

Treatment
early season nutrient stresse0
Outcome
uptake of all nutrientse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uptake of all nutrients was significantly lower under the early season nutrient stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nutrient stress reduced yield by 1.58 to 3.4 Mg ha -1.

Treatment
early season nutrient stresse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
1.58 Mg ha -1 to 3.4 Mg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early season nutrient stress caused 1.58 Mg ha -1 to 3.4 Mg ha -1 yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction under SSDI was 37.6-38.2%.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
37.6-38.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent yield reduction under the SSDI system was 37.6-38.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction under overhead irrigation was 11.7-13%.

Outcome
yield reductione2
Value
11.7-13%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the overhead irrigation system was 11.7-13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percent yield reduction under the SSDI system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1797 · show in text ↑

climate site · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

climate site · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Light-rich border plants had shorter stalks with greater diameter.

    Response of Zea mays L. to a “Light Rich” Field Environment1 · 1967 · compared with plants from inner rows or normal border rows

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.