Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Bio-efficacy of different Acaricides against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch infesting okra under field condition

SS Gamit; CB Varma

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted at Entomology farm, Department of Entomology, BACA, AAU, Anand during summer, 2021 to determine the bio-efficacy of different acaricides against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae by using Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications and the results revealed that the lowest (3.00 mites/1 cm2 leaf area) population of mite were found in plots treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02% and it was at par with abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057% (3.19 mites/1 cm2 leaf area) and fenazaquin 10 EC @ 0.012% (3.34 mites/1 cm2 leaf area). The highest fruit yield was recorded from the plot treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02% (8574 kg/ha) and it was at par with abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057% (8558 kg/ha) and fenazaquin 10 EC @ 0.012% (8541 kg/ha) as compared to the rest of treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiromesifen-treated okra plots had the lowest mite population, 3.00 mites/1 cm2 leaf area.

Treatment
spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%e0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
population of mitee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.00 mites/1 cm2 leaf areae0
Setting
Entomology farm, Department of Entomology, BACA, AAU, Anande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest (3.00 mites/1 cm2 leaf area) population of mite were found in plots treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–438 · show in text ↑
e1

“Entomology farm, Department of Entomology, BACA, AAU, Anand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abamectin-treated plots had 3.19 mites/1 cm2 leaf area and were at par with spiromesifen.

Treatment
abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057%e0
Interactor
mitese0pest
Outcome
mites/1 cm2 leaf areae0
Direction
at pare0
Value
3.19 mites/1 cm2 leaf areae0
Comparator
spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“it was at par with abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057% (3.19 mites/1 cm2 leaf area)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–518 · show in text ↑
e1

“plots treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenazaquin-treated plots had 3.34 mites/1 cm2 leaf area and were at par with spiromesifen.

Treatment
fenazaquin 10 EC @ 0.012%e0
Interactor
mitese0pest
Outcome
mites/1 cm2 leaf areae0
Direction
at pare0
Value
3.34 mites/1 cm2 leaf areae0
Comparator
spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“it was at par with abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057% (3.19 mites/1 cm2 leaf area) and fenazaquin 10 EC @ 0.012% (3.34 mites/1 cm2 leaf area)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
e1

“plots treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiromesifen-treated okra plots had the highest fruit yield, 8574 kg/ha.

Treatment
spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8574 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest fruit yield was recorded from the plot treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02% (8574 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abamectin-treated plots yielded 8558 kg/ha, at par with spiromesifen.

Treatment
abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057%e0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
at pare0
Value
8558 kg/hae0
Comparator
spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“it was at par with abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057% (8558 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest fruit yield was recorded from the plot treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02% (8574 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenazaquin-treated plots yielded 8541 kg/ha, at par with spiromesifen.

Treatment
fenazaquin 10 EC @ 0.012%e0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
at pare0
Value
8541 kg/hae0
Comparator
spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“it was at par with abamectin 1.9 EC @ 0.00057% (8558 kg/ha) and fenazaquin 10 EC @ 0.012% (8541 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest fruit yield was recorded from the plot treated with spiromesifen 22.9 SC @ 0.02% (8574 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–684 · show in text ↑

abamectin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fenazaquin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spiromesifen · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

spiromesifen · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fenazaquin · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.