Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) on photosynthetic characteristics of cotton seedlings under saline-alkali stress

Zicheng Peng; Tayyaba Zulfiqar; Haichang Yang; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The study aimed to find the best Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) strain for cotton growth in Xinjiang's salinity and alkali conditions. Cotton (Xinluzao 45) was treated with Funneliformis mosseae (GM), Rhizophagus irregularis (GI), and Claroideoglomus etunicatum (GE) as treatments, while untreated cotton served as the control (CK). Salinity stress was applied post-3-leaf stage in cotton. The study analyzed cotton's reactions to diverse saline-alkali stresses, focusing on nutrient processes and metabolism. By analyzing the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of plants inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae to evaluate its salt tolerance. Saline-alkali stress reduced chlorophyll and hindered photosynthesis, hampering cotton growth. However, AMF inoculation mitigated these effects, enhancing photosynthetic rates, CO 2 concentration, transpiration, energy use efficiency, and overall cotton growth under similar stress levels. GM and GE treatments yielded similar positive effects. AMF inoculation enhanced cotton plant height and biomass. In GM treatment, cotton exhibited notably higher root length than other treatments, showing superior growth under various conditions. In summary, GM-treated cotton had the highest infection rate, followed by GE-treated cotton, with GI-treated cotton having the lowest rate (GM averaging 0.95). Cotton inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae, Rhizophagus irregularis, and Claroideoglomus etunicatum juvenile showed enhanced chlorophyll and photosynthetic levels, reducing salinity effects. Funneliformis mosseae had the most significant positive impact.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline-alkali stress reduced cotton chlorophyll and photosynthesis.

Treatment
Saline-alkali stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll and hindered photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Saline-alkali stress reduced chlorophyll and hindered photosynthesis, hampering cotton growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation improved cotton photosynthetic rates, CO2 concentration, transpiration and energy use efficiency under stress.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic rates, CO 2 concentration, transpiration, energy use efficiencye0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation mitigated these effects, enhancing photosynthetic rates, CO 2 concentration, transpiration, energy use efficiency, and overall cotton growth under similar stress levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased cotton height and biomass.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
cotton plant height and biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation enhanced cotton plant height and biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Funneliformis mosseae gave higher cotton root length than other treatments.

Treatment
GM treatmente0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In GM treatment, cotton exhibited notably higher root length than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Funneliformis mosseae treatment had the highest colonization rate, followed by GE then GI.

Treatment
GM-treated cottone0
Outcome
infection ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GM-treated cotton had the highest infection rate, followed by GE-treated cotton, with GI-treated cotton having the lowest rate (GM averaging 0.95).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three AMF treatments enhanced chlorophyll and photosynthetic levels in cotton.

Treatment
inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae, Rhizophagus irregularis, and Claroideoglomus etunicatum juvenilee0
Outcome
chlorophyll and photosynthetic levelse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae, Rhizophagus irregularis, and Claroideoglomus etunicatum juvenile showed enhanced chlorophyll and photosynthetic levels, reducing salinity effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1551 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

26 papers: 4 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

transgenic · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 61 positive, 12 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.