Paper · 2024 · Plants

Mycorrhizas Affect Physiological Performance, Antioxidant System, Photosynthesis, Endogenous Hormones, and Water Content in Cotton under Salt Stress

De-Jian Zhang; Cui-Ling Tong; Qiong-Shan Wang; et al.

15
claims
24
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

to explore its effects on the saline-alkali tolerance of cotton. Our results showed that salt stress noticeably decreased cotton seedling growth parameters (such as plant height, number of leaves, dry weight, root system architecture, etc.), while AMF exhibited a remarkable effect on promoting growth. It was noteworthy that AMF significantly mitigated the inhibitory effect of salt on cotton seedlings. However, AMF colonization in root and soil hyphal length were collectively descended via salt stress. With regard to osmotic regulating substances, Pro and MDA values in roots were significantly increased when seedlings were exposed to salt stress, while AMF only partially mitigated these reactions. Salt stress increased ROS levels in the roots of cotton seedlings and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, POD, and CAT), while AMF mitigated the increases in ROS levels but further strengthened antioxidant enzyme activity. AMF inoculation increased the photosynthesis parameters of cotton seedling leaves to varying degrees, while salt stress decreased them dramatically. When inoculated with AMF under a salt stress environment, only partial mitigation of these photosynthesis values was observed. Under saline-alkali stress, AMF improved the leaf fluorescence parameters (φPSII, Fv'/Fm', and qP) of cotton seedlings, leaf chlorophyll levels, and root endogenous hormones (IAA and BR); promoted the absorption of water; and maintained nitrogen balance, thus alleviating the damage from salt stress on the growth of cotton plants to some extent. In summary, mycorrhizal cotton seedlings may exhibit mechanisms involving root system architecture, the antioxidant system, photosynthesis, leaf fluorescence, endogenous hormones, water content, and nitrogen balance that increase their resistance to saline-alkali environments. This study provide a theoretical basis for further exploring the application of AMF to enhance the salt tolerance of cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced cotton seedling growth parameters.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
cotton seedling growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt stress noticeably decreased cotton seedling growth parameters (such as plant height, number of leaves, dry weight, root system architecture, etc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF promoted cotton seedling growth and mitigated the inhibitory effect of salt.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotinge0
Comparator
salte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF exhibited a remarkable effect on promoting growth. It was noteworthy that AMF significantly mitigated the inhibitory effect of salt on cotton seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress decreased AMF root colonization and soil hyphal length.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF colonization in root and soil hyphal lengthe0
Direction
descendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF colonization in root and soil hyphal length were collectively descended via salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased root Pro and MDA values.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
Pro and MDA values in rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pro and MDA values in roots were significantly increased when seedlings were exposed to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF partially mitigated salt induced root Pro and MDA responses.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Pro and MDA values in rootse1
Direction
mitigatede0
Comparator
salt stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while AMF only partially mitigated these reactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pro and MDA values in roots were significantly increased when seedlings were exposed to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased root ROS levels and antioxidant enzyme activity.

Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
ROS levels in the roots of cotton seedlings and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress increased ROS levels in the roots of cotton seedlings and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, POD, and CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF mitigated the increase in root ROS levels.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
ROS levelse0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF mitigated the increases in ROS levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF further strengthened antioxidant enzyme activity.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
strengthenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF mitigated the increases in ROS levels but further strengthened antioxidant enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased cotton leaf photosynthesis parameters.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthesis parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation increased the photosynthesis parameters of cotton seedling leaves to varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress dramatically decreased cotton leaf photosynthesis parameters.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
photosynthesis parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation increased the photosynthesis parameters of cotton seedling leaves to varying degrees, while salt stress decreased them dramatically.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF only partially mitigated photosynthesis losses under salt stress.

Treatment
inoculated with AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthesis valuese0
Direction
mitigatione0
Comparator
salt stress environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When inoculated with AMF under a salt stress environment, only partial mitigation of these photosynthesis values was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under saline-alkali stress, AMF improved leaf fluorescence parameters and chlorophyll levels.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
leaf fluorescence parameters (φPSII, Fv'/Fm', and qP) of cotton seedlings, leaf chlorophyll levelse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under saline-alkali stress, AMF improved the leaf fluorescence parameters (φPSII, Fv'/Fm', and qP) of cotton seedlings, leaf chlorophyll levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under saline-alkali stress, AMF improved root IAA and BR hormones.

Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root endogenous hormones (IAA and BR)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under saline-alkali stress, AMF improved the leaf fluorescence parameters (φPSII, Fv'/Fm', and qP) of cotton seedlings, leaf chlorophyll levels, and root endogenous hormones (IAA and BR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF promoted water absorption under saline-alkali stress.

Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
absorption of watere0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promoted the absorption of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under saline-alkali stress, AMF improved the leaf fluorescence parameters (φPSII, Fv'/Fm', and qP) of cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF maintained nitrogen balance under saline-alkali stress.

Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen balancee0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintained nitrogen balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1465 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under saline-alkali stress, AMF improved the leaf fluorescence parameters (φPSII, Fv'/Fm', and qP) of cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1330 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

26 papers: 4 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

salinity · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salinity · soil: biology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: biology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.