Paper · 2016 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

The Effects of Different NaCl Concentrations on the Germination of Cotton

Şahin, Cenk Burak; Akçalı, Cem Tufan

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, 4 different cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties (Carisma, Flash, PG2018 and Lydia) and a total of 7 doses including 6 NaCl concentrations and a control (0, 25 mM, 50 mM, 75 mM, 100 mM, 125 mM, 150 mM) group were used. Effects of different NaCl concentrations on germination of cotton varieties was examined. The study was arranged in a randomized complete plot in a factorial experiment design with 4 replications. As a result, it was obtained that the average germination rates between varieties were 44.29% (PG2018 and Flash), 35% (Carisma) and 28.57% (Lydia), respectively. In addition, 100 mM NaCl concentration decreased germination rate up to 30%, subsequent doses stopped germination almost completely for whole varieties. It was determined that PG2018 and Flash varieties were more resistant to increasing salt concentrations and different varieties showed significant variability of the response to the concentrations of salt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PG2018 and Flash cotton varieties had an average germination rate of 44.29%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Material
PG2018 and Flashe2
Outcome
average germination ratese2
Value
44.29%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average germination rates between varieties were 44.29% (PG2018 and Flash), 35% (Carisma) and 28.57% (Lydia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carisma cotton variety had an average germination rate of 35%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Material
Carismae2
Outcome
average germination ratese2
Value
35%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average germination rates between varieties were 44.29% (PG2018 and Flash), 35% (Carisma) and 28.57% (Lydia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lydia cotton variety had an average germination rate of 28.57%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Material
Lydiae2
Outcome
average germination ratese2
Value
28.57%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average germination rates between varieties were 44.29% (PG2018 and Flash), 35% (Carisma) and 28.57% (Lydia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 mM NaCl decreased cotton germination rate by up to 30%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
100 mM NaCl concentratione3
Outcome
germination ratee3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
up to 30%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–67 · show in text ↑
e3

“100 mM NaCl concentration decreased germination rate up to 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher NaCl doses after 100 mM almost completely stopped cotton germination in all varieties.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
subsequent dosese4
Outcome
germinatione4
Direction
stoppede4
Qualifier
almost completelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“subsequent doses stopped germination almost completely for whole varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PG2018 and Flash cotton varieties were more resistant to increasing salt concentrations.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Material
PG2018 and Flashe5
Treatment
increasing salt concentrationse5
Outcome
resistant to increasing salt concentrationse5
Direction
more resistante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–67 · show in text ↑
e5

“PG2018 and Flash varieties were more resistant to increasing salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton varieties differed significantly in their germination response to salt concentrations.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
concentrations of salte6
Outcome
variability of the response to the concentrations of salte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–67 · show in text ↑
e6

“different varieties showed significant variability of the response to the concentrations of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–954 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

42 papers: 15 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

salinity · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.