Paper · 2013 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

NaCl-Induced Changes of Ion Fluxes in Roots of Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Mao-ying LI; Fang-jun LI; Yue-sen YUE; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton is grown worldwide, including in saline soils, but the effect of salinity on ion fluxes of Bt cotton remains unknown. Responses of two transgenic Bt cotton genotypes (SGK321 and 29317) and their corresponding receptors, Shiyuan 321 (SY321) and Jihe 321 (J321), to 150 mmol L−1 NaCl stress were studied in a growth chamber. The root dry weight of SGK321 and 29317 under NaCl treatment was decreased by 30 and 31%, respectively. However, their corresponding receptor cultivars SY321 and J321 were less affected (19 and 24%, respectively). The root length and surface area of the Bt cultivars were significantly decreased relative to their receptors under salt stress. NaCl treatment significantly increased Cry1Ac mRNA transcript levels in SGK321 and 29317 but did not affect Bt protein content in leaves or roots of either cultivar at 1 and 7 d after NaCl treatment. Fluxes of Na+, K+, and H+ in roots were investigated using the scanning ion-selective electrode technique. Both mean K+ efflux rate and transient K+ efflux of the Bt cultivars increased four-fold compared to their corresponding receptors when exposed to salinity stress. There were no significant differences in Na+ efflux between Bt and non-Bt cottons. Furthermore, the Na+ contents in roots and leaves of all genotypes dramatically increased under salt stress, whereas K+ contents decreased. Our results suggested that Bt cotton cultivars are more sensitive to salt stress than their receptor genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight of SGK321 decreased under NaCl treatment by 30%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
SGK321e1
Treatment
NaCl treatmente1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
30e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The root dry weight of SGK321 and 29317 under NaCl treatment was decreased by 30 and 31%, respectively. However, their corresponding receptor cultivars SY321 and J321 were less affected (19 and 24%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–570 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight of line 29317 decreased under NaCl treatment by 31%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
29317e1
Treatment
NaCl treatmente1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
31%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The root dry weight of SGK321 and 29317 under NaCl treatment was decreased by 30 and 31%, respectively. However, their corresponding receptor cultivars SY321 and J321 were less affected (19 and 24%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–570 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Receptor cultivar SY321 was less affected in root dry weight under NaCl treatment (19%).

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
SY321e1
Treatment
NaCl treatmente1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
less affectede1
Value
19e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The root dry weight of SGK321 and 29317 under NaCl treatment was decreased by 30 and 31%, respectively. However, their corresponding receptor cultivars SY321 and J321 were less affected (19 and 24%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–570 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Receptor cultivar J321 was less affected in root dry weight under NaCl treatment (24%).

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
J321e1
Treatment
NaCl treatmente1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
less affectede1
Value
24%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The root dry weight of SGK321 and 29317 under NaCl treatment was decreased by 30 and 31%, respectively. However, their corresponding receptor cultivars SY321 and J321 were less affected (19 and 24%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–570 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length and surface area of Bt cultivars were significantly decreased relative to their receptors under salt stress.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
Bt cultivarse2
Treatment
salt stresse2
Outcome
root length and surface areae2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
their receptorse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The root length and surface area of the Bt cultivars were significantly decreased relative to their receptors under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–699 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl treatment significantly increased Cry1Ac mRNA transcript levels in SGK321 and 29317.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
SGK321 and 29317e3
Treatment
NaCl treatmente3
Gene
Cry1Ace3
Outcome
mRNA transcript levelse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“NaCl treatment significantly increased Cry1Ac mRNA transcript levels in SGK321 and 29317 but did not affect Bt protein content in leaves or roots of either cultivar at 1 and 7 d after NaCl treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–899 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl treatment did not affect Bt protein content in leaves or roots.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Treatment
NaCl treatmente3
Outcome
Bt protein contente3
Direction
did not affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“NaCl treatment significantly increased Cry1Ac mRNA transcript levels in SGK321 and 29317 but did not affect Bt protein content in leaves or roots of either cultivar at 1 and 7 d after NaCl treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–899 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean K+ efflux rate and transient K+ efflux of Bt cultivars increased four-fold compared with receptors under salinity stress.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
Bt cultivarse4
Treatment
salinity stresse4
Compound
K+e4
Outcome
mean K+ efflux rate and transient K+ effluxe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
four-folde4
Comparator
their corresponding receptorse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Both mean K+ efflux rate and transient K+ efflux of the Bt cultivars increased four-fold compared to their corresponding receptors when exposed to salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1170 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ efflux did not differ significantly between Bt and non-Bt cottons.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Outcome
Na+ effluxe5
Comparator
non-Bt cottonse5

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“There were no significant differences in Na+ efflux between Bt and non-Bt cottons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1253 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ contents in roots and leaves increased under salt stress.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Treatment
salt stresse6
Compound
Na+e6
Outcome
Na+ contents in roots and leavese6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Furthermore, the Na+ contents in roots and leaves of all genotypes dramatically increased under salt stress, whereas K+ contents decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1393 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K+ contents decreased under salt stress.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Treatment
salt stresse6
Compound
K+e6
Outcome
K+ contentse6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Furthermore, the Na+ contents in roots and leaves of all genotypes dramatically increased under salt stress, whereas K+ contents decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1393 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton cultivars are more sensitive to salt stress than their receptor genotypes.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt1
Material
Bt cotton cultivarse7
Treatment
salt stresse7
Outcome
sensitive to salt stresse7
Direction
more sensitivee7
Comparator
their receptor genotypese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Our results suggested that Bt cotton cultivars are more sensitive to salt stress than their receptor genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1505 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

42 papers: 15 positive, 27 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

sodium chloride · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

salinity · physiology: ion balance · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.