Abstract
The plasma membrane (PM) H + -ATPase is crucial for a plant defense system. However, there is currently no consensus on whether the PM H + -ATPase plays a role in alleviating the toxic effects of herbicides on nontarget plants. We found that under the herbicide imazethapyr (IM) exposure, PM H + -ATPase activity in wheat roots increased by approximately 69.53%, leading to rhizosphere acidification. When PM H + -ATPase activity is inhibited, the toxicity of IM significantly increases: When exposed to IM alone, the total Fe content of wheat roots decreased by 29.07%, the relative Fe 2+ content increased by 27.75%, and the ROS content increased by 27.74%. When the PM H + -ATPase activity was inhibited, the corresponding data under IM exposure were 37.36%, 215%, and 57.68%, respectively. This work delves into the role of PM H + -ATPase in mediating the detoxification mechanism in plants exposed to herbicides, offering new insights into enhancing crop resistance against herbicides.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr exposure increased wheat root PM H + -ATPase activity by approximately 69.53%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- herbicide imazethapyr (IM) exposuree0
- Gene
- PM H + -ATPasee0
- Outcome
- PM H + -ATPase activitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 69.53%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under the herbicide imazethapyr (IM) exposure, PM H + -ATPase activity in wheat roots increased by approximately 69.53%”
Claim · model-written summary
Increased ATPase activity under imazethapyr led to rhizosphere acidification.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Gene
- PM H + -ATPasee0
- Outcome
- rhizosphere acidificatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PM H + -ATPase activity in wheat roots increased by approximately 69.53%, leading to rhizosphere acidification.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inhibiting PM H + -ATPase significantly increased imazethapyr toxicity.
- Treatment
- PM H + -ATPase activity is inhibitede0
- Gene
- PM H + -ATPasee0
- Outcome
- toxicity of IMe0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- IM alonee1
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“When PM H + -ATPase activity is inhibited, the toxicity of IM significantly increases:”
e1“When exposed to IM alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr alone decreased total Fe content of wheat roots by 29.07%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- IM alonee0
- Outcome
- total Fe contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 29.07%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When exposed to IM alone, the total Fe content of wheat roots decreased by 29.07%”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr alone increased relative Fe 2+ content by 27.75%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- IM alonee0
- Outcome
- relative Fe 2+ contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 27.75%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When exposed to IM alone, the total Fe content of wheat roots decreased by 29.07%, the relative Fe 2+ content increased by 27.75%”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr alone increased ROS content by 27.74%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- IM alonee1
- Outcome
- ROS contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 27.74%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the ROS content increased by 27.74%”
t0“Wheat”
e1“When exposed to IM alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Under imazethapyr with ATPase inhibition, total root Fe content fell by 37.36%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- PM H + -ATPase activity was inhibitede0
- Outcome
- total Fe content of wheat rootse1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 37.36%e0
- Comparator
- IM exposuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When the PM H + -ATPase activity was inhibited, the corresponding data under IM exposure were 37.36%, 215%, and 57.68%, respectively.”
e1“the total Fe content of wheat roots decreased by 29.07%, the relative Fe 2+ content increased by 27.75%, and the ROS content increased by 27.74%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Under imazethapyr with ATPase inhibition, relative Fe 2+ content rose by 215%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- PM H + -ATPase activity was inhibitede0
- Outcome
- relative Fe 2+ contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 215%e0
- Comparator
- IM exposuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When the PM H + -ATPase activity was inhibited, the corresponding data under IM exposure were 37.36%, 215%, and 57.68%, respectively.”
e1“the total Fe content of wheat roots decreased by 29.07%, the relative Fe 2+ content increased by 27.75%, and the ROS content increased by 27.74%.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Under imazethapyr with ATPase inhibition, ROS content rose by 57.68%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- PM H + -ATPase activity was inhibitede0
- Outcome
- ROS contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 57.68%e0
- Comparator
- IM exposuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When the PM H + -ATPase activity was inhibited, the corresponding data under IM exposure were 37.36%, 215%, and 57.68%, respectively.”
e1“the ROS content increased by 27.74%”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
physical treatment · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
physical treatment · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
physical treatment · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.