Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Impact of simultaneous increase in CO2 and temperature on soil aggregates, associated organic carbon, and nutritional quality of rice–wheat grains

Karnena Koteswara Rao; Sharad Kumar Dwivedi; Santosh Kumar; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Background Food and nutritional security remain a major thrust area in the under developed and developing countries. These problems are exaggerated by the unprecedented challenges of climate change. Aims The aim of this study was to assess the impact of climate change on grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes as well as their effect on soil aggregate fractions and aggregate associated carbon. Methodology In the context, the present study was formulated by considering four predicted climate scenarios, namely, T 0 C 0 (ambient condition), T 0 C 1 (approx. 25% higher CO 2 ), T 1 C 0 (2°C higher temperature) and T 1 C 1 (25% higher CO 2 + 2°C higher temperature) and their impact on grain quality of wheat (HD2967, HD2733, DBW17, and HD3093) and rice (IR83376‐B‐B‐24‐2, IR84895‐B‐127‐CRA‐5‐1‐1, R Bhagwati, and IR64) genotypes as well as soil aggregate fractions and aggregate associated carbon. Results The result revealed that T 0 C 1 has a negative impact on grain nitrogen and protein content. On an average, nitrogen content in wheat and rice showed a decrease of about 15.55% (5.52%–25.32%) and 11.44% (3.33%–23.86%), respectively. Interestingly, the concurrent effect of elevated CO 2 and temperature resulted in higher nitrogen and protein content as compared to other climate conditions. Further, P (P) content in the wheat and rice grains also improved under the elevated CO 2 condition, whereas the content of potassium was not significantly influenced. Apart from major nutrients, micronutrients (Zn and Fe) were significantly influenced by climatic variables. The study revealed that grain Zn and Fe content of both the crops were reduced due to elevated CO 2 . The data on soil aggregate fractions revealed that elevated CO 2 favors the formation of macro‐aggregate, whereas an increase in temperature favors micro‐aggregate fractions in the soil. Further, the elevation of CO 2 also resulted in the accumulation of more carbon in the macro‐aggregates. Conclusion We conclude that elevated CO 2 and temperature cause specific changes in soil aggregate formation and grain nutrient quality. Based on molar ratio of P/Zn and P/Fe, we identified varieties of rice (IR83376‐B‐B‐24‐2) and wheat (HD2733) with higher bioavailability to address the nutritional security with changing climate in developing countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 plus 2 C warming (T 0 C 1) had a negative impact on grain nitrogen and protein content of wheat and rice genotypes relative to ambient conditions.

Treatment
T 0 C 1e1
Outcome
grain nitrogen and protein contente1
Direction
negative impacte1
Comparator
T 0 C 0 (ambient condition)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result revealed that T 0 C 1 has a negative impact on grain nitrogen and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1012 · show in text ↑
e2

“T 0 C 0 (ambient condition)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen content in wheat grain decreased by about 15.55% (5.52%–25.32%) under T 0 C 1 relative to ambient conditions.

Treatment
T 0 C 1e1
Outcome
nitrogen contente1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
15.55% (5.52%–25.32%)e1
Comparator
T 0 C 0 (ambient condition)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T 0 C 1 has a negative impact on grain nitrogen and protein content. On an average, nitrogen content in wheat and rice showed a decrease of about 15.55% (5.52%–25.32%) and 11.44% (3.33%–23.86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1138 · show in text ↑
e2

“T 0 C 0 (ambient condition)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen content in rice grain decreased by about 11.44% (3.33%–23.86%) under T 0 C 1 relative to ambient conditions.

Treatment
T 0 C 1e1
Outcome
nitrogen contente1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
11.44% (3.33%–23.86%)e1
Comparator
T 0 C 0 (ambient condition)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“T 0 C 1 has a negative impact on grain nitrogen and protein content. On an average, nitrogen content in wheat and rice showed a decrease of about 15.55% (5.52%–25.32%) and 11.44% (3.33%–23.86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1138 · show in text ↑
e2

“T 0 C 0 (ambient condition)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature gave higher nitrogen and protein content than the other climate conditions.

Treatment
concurrent effect of elevated CO 2 and temperaturee3
Outcome
nitrogen and protein contente3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other climate conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“the concurrent effect of elevated CO 2 and temperature resulted in higher nitrogen and protein content as compared to other climate conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus content of wheat and rice grains improved under elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 conditione4
Outcome
P (P) contente4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“P (P) content in the wheat and rice grains also improved under the elevated CO 2 condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1412 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain potassium content was not significantly influenced by the climate treatments.

Outcome
content of potassiume5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas the content of potassium was not significantly influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients Zn and Fe in grain were significantly influenced by climatic variables.

Outcome
micronutrients (Zn and Fe)e6
Qualifier
significantly influenced by climatic variablese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e6

“micronutrients (Zn and Fe) were significantly influenced by climatic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn and Fe content of both crops was reduced by elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e7
Outcome
grain Zn and Fe contente7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e7

“grain Zn and Fe content of both the crops were reduced due to elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 favours the formation of macro-aggregates in soil.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e2
Outcome
formation of macro‐aggregatee2
Direction
favorse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“elevated CO 2 favors the formation of macro‐aggregate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An increase in temperature favours micro-aggregate fractions in soil.

Treatment
an increase in temperaturee2
Outcome
micro‐aggregate fractionse2
Direction
favorse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“an increase in temperature favors micro‐aggregate fractions in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased the accumulation of carbon in macro-aggregates.

Treatment
the elevation of CO 2e2
Outcome
carbon in the macro‐aggregatese2
Direction
accumulation of moree2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain quality of wheat and rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“the elevation of CO 2 also resulted in the accumulation of more carbon in the macro‐aggregates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1981 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice variety IR83376-B-B-24-2 and wheat variety HD2733 were identified as having higher bioavailability of P/Zn and P/Fe molar ratios.

Material
IR83376‐B‐B‐24‐2e2
Outcome
bioavailabilitye2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Based on molar ratio of P/Zn and P/Fe, we identified varieties of rice (IR83376‐B‐B‐24‐2) and wheat (HD2733) with higher bioavailability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2256 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

32 papers: 3 positive, 29 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

43 papers: 23 positive, 20 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

63 papers: 23 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

co2 · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 23 positive, 17 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 26 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.