Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Impact of integrated nutrient management on the growth, yield, and quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)

Saif Ali Pathan; Jitendra Kumar; Vinay Joseph Silas; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled Study of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]" was conducted during Kharif season from July to November 2023 at College of Horticulture, Rama University, Kanpur. he experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with 10 treatments viz., T1-Control (No use of fertilizers), T2-100% Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), T3-75% RDF + 25%RDN through FYM + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB], T4-50% RDF + 50% RDN through FYM, T5-75% RDF + 25% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor + Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB], T6-50% RDF + 50% RDN through vermicompost, T7-75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB], T8-50% RDF + 25% RDN through FYM + 25% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor + Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB], T9 -100% RDN through FYM and T10-100% RDN through vermicompost. These treatments were replicated thrice. The growth attributes were significantly affected due to the different INM treatments. Application of inorganic fertilizers in combination with organic manures and biofertilizers i.e. 75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB] recorded significantly higher plant height (25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cm), number of leaves (11.54, 45.55 and 55.50), number of branches (0, 2.19 and 4.41) and inter nodal length (2.41, 5.47 and 6.95 cm) at 30, 60 and at final harvest respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined fertilizer and biofertilizer treatment increased okra height.

Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB]e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB] recorded significantly higher plant height (25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of integrated nutrient management on the growth, yield, and quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB] recorded significantly higher plant height (25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cm), number of leaves (11.54, 45.55 and 55.50), number of branches (0, 2.19 and 4.41) and inter nodal length (2.41, 5.47 and 6.95 cm) at 30, 60 and at final harvest respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased okra leaf number.

Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB]t1
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.54, 45.55 and 55.50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recorded significantly higher plant height (25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cm), number of leaves (11.54, 45.55 and 55.50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of integrated nutrient management on the growth, yield, and quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB] recorded significantly higher plant height (25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cm), number of leaves (11.54, 45.55 and 55.50), number of branches (0, 2.19 and 4.41) and inter nodal length (2.41, 5.47 and 6.95 cm) at 30, 60 and at final harvest respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased okra branch number.

Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB]t1
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
highert1
Value
0, 2.19 and 4.41e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of branches (0, 2.19 and 4.41)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of integrated nutrient management on the growth, yield, and quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB] recorded significantly higher plant height (25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cm), number of leaves (11.54, 45.55 and 55.50), number of branches (0, 2.19 and 4.41) and inter nodal length (2.41, 5.47 and 6.95 cm) at 30, 60 and at final harvest respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased okra internodal length.

Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB]t1
Outcome
inter nodal lengthe0
Direction
highert1
Value
2.41, 5.47 and 6.95 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inter nodal length (2.41, 5.47 and 6.95 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of integrated nutrient management on the growth, yield, and quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“75% RDF + 12.5% RDN through FYM + 12.5% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobactor+ Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria [PSB] recorded significantly higher plant height (25.16, 78.68, and 125.64 cm), number of leaves (11.54, 45.55 and 55.50), number of branches (0, 2.19 and 4.41) and inter nodal length (2.41, 5.47 and 6.95 cm) at 30, 60 and at final harvest respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1587 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

inoculation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

inoculation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 46 positive, 8 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.