Paper · 2024 · Agriculture

Management of Rust in Wheat Using IPM Principles and Alternative Products

Lise Nistrup Jørgensen; Niels Matzen; Rebekka Leitzke; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Overall, there is a major wish that European farmers implement integrated pest management (IPM), particularly to reduce dependence on pesticides. In the European Rustwatch project, partners conducted nineteen trials across nine different countries during 2020 and 2021 to investigate different IPM strategies, focusing on controlling rust diseases in winter wheat. The trials included the use of varieties with contrasting levels of resistance, variety mixtures, reduced fungicide rates, thresholds, and Decision Support Systems (DSSs), and testing alternative products to fungicides. Sixteen trials developed yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) infections, and six trials developed brown rust (Puccinia triticina) infections. Resistant varieties proved highly effective in keeping down yellow rust infection, and variety mixtures also effectively reduced infection levels and stabilized yields. Rust was fully controlled using 25% of standard fungicide rates, even under high disease pressure. Using DSSs provided sufficient control of rust diseases and resulted in competitive net economic returns due to fewer fungicide applications. The alternative products tested included two biological control agents and four alternative chemistries, which all gave inferior and insufficient control against rust compared with chemical fungicides. The trial work demonstrated that there are good and reliable options for including IPM into disease control in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow rust occurred in sixteen wheat trials.

Interactor
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. triticiPuccinia striiformis f. sp. triticie0pathogen
Outcome
yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) infectionse0
Value
Sixteen trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici · InteractorBrauna55 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sixteen trials developed yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown rust occurred in six wheat trials.

Interactor
Puccinia triticinaPuccinia triticinae0pathogen
Outcome
brown rust (Puccinia triticina) infectionse0
Value
six trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia triticina
Puccinia triticina · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six trials developed brown rust (Puccinia triticina) infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant varieties kept yellow rust infection down.

Treatment
Resistant varietiese0
Outcome
yellow rust infectione0
Direction
keeping downe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistant varieties proved highly effective in keeping down yellow rust infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety mixtures reduced rust infection levels.

Treatment
variety mixturese0
Outcome
infection levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety mixtures also effectively reduced infection levels and stabilized yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety mixtures stabilized yields.

Treatment
variety mixturese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
stabilizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety mixtures also effectively reduced infection levels and stabilized yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A quarter of standard fungicide rates fully controlled rust even under high disease pressure.

Treatment
25% of standard fungicide ratese0
Outcome
Ruste0
Direction
fully controllede0
Qualifier
high disease pressuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rust was fully controlled using 25% of standard fungicide rates, even under high disease pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decision support systems gave sufficient rust control.

Treatment
Using DSSse0
Outcome
control of rust diseasese0
Direction
sufficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using DSSs provided sufficient control of rust diseases and resulted in competitive net economic returns due to fewer fungicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decision support systems gave competitive net economic returns through fewer fungicide applications.

Treatment
Using DSSse0
Outcome
net economic returnse0
Direction
competitivee0
Qualifier
fewer fungicide applicationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using DSSs provided sufficient control of rust diseases and resulted in competitive net economic returns due to fewer fungicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative products controlled rust less effectively than chemical fungicides.

Treatment
two biological control agents and four alternative chemistriese0
Outcome
control against ruste0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
chemical fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two biological control agents and four alternative chemistries, which all gave inferior and insufficient control against rust compared with chemical fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude reliable integrated pest management options exist for wheat disease control.

Outcome
including IPM into disease controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are good and reliable options for including IPM into disease control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1469 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.