Paper · 2024 · New Valley Journal of Agricultural Science

Impact of Bio-Fertilizers and Nano Silica Rates on Bread Wheat Productivity under the New Valley conditions

Eman Abdallah Mohamed; Ragab Dawood; Ahmed Abd-Elmonem; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To study the wheat productivity response to some bio-fertilizer types and nano silica rates under the New Valley conditions, a field experiment was implemented out in a private farm at the two successive growing seasons (2021/2022 and 2022/2023) in the New Valley governorate (El-Dakhla Oasis). The experiment was laid out using randomized complete blocks design in split plot arrangement were, the biofertilizers (Cerialen, Rhizobacteria and Azotobacter) plus control were assigned to the main plots, and Nano-Silica concentrations (0, 200, 400 and 600 ppm) were allocated in the sub-plots with four replications. All studied traits affected significantly by bio-fertilizer and nano silica rates in both seasons. Where, the Rhizobacteria biofertilizer gave tallest plants, longest spikes, the highest spikes number/m2, the heaviest weights of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad. Here too, increasing nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm raise the number of spikes/m2, weight of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad, as well as plant height and spike length in both seasons. Furthermore, biofertilizers x nano-silica concentration interaction exhibited a significant impact on all studied traits in both seasons, except grain yield/fad in the first season. Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm interaction gave the highest mean values of plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, 1000 grain weight and grain yield/fad in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria produced highest plants.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Rhizobacteria biofertilizer gave tallest plants, longest spikes, the highest spikes number/m2, the heaviest weights of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria produced highest spikes.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
spikese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Rhizobacteria biofertilizer gave tallest plants, longest spikes, the highest spikes number/m2, the heaviest weights of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria produced highest spikes number/m2.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
spikes number/m2e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Rhizobacteria biofertilizer gave tallest plants, longest spikes, the highest spikes number/m2, the heaviest weights of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria produced highest weights of 1000-grain.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
weights of 1000-graine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Rhizobacteria biofertilizer gave tallest plants, longest spikes, the highest spikes number/m2, the heaviest weights of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria produced highest grain yield/fad.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
grain yield/fade0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Rhizobacteria biofertilizer gave tallest plants, longest spikes, the highest spikes number/m2, the heaviest weights of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm produced raise number of spikes/m2.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppme0
Outcome
number of spikes/m2e0
Direction
raisee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm raise the number of spikes/m2, weight of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad, as well as plant height and spike length in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm produced raise weight of 1000-grain.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppme0
Outcome
weight of 1000-graine0
Direction
raisee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm raise the number of spikes/m2, weight of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad, as well as plant height and spike length in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm produced raise grain yield/fad.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppme0
Outcome
grain yield/fade0
Direction
raisee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm raise the number of spikes/m2, weight of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad, as well as plant height and spike length in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm produced raise plant height.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
raisee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm raise the number of spikes/m2, weight of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad, as well as plant height and spike length in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm produced raise spike length.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppme0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
raisee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing nano silica concentrations up to 600 ppm raise the number of spikes/m2, weight of 1000-grain and grain yield/fad, as well as plant height and spike length in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm produced highest plant height.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteria x 600 ppme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm interaction gave the highest mean values of plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, 1000 grain weight and grain yield/fad in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm produced highest spike length.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteria x 600 ppme0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm interaction gave the highest mean values of plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, 1000 grain weight and grain yield/fad in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm produced highest number of spikes/m2.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteria x 600 ppme0
Outcome
number of spikes/m2e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm interaction gave the highest mean values of plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, 1000 grain weight and grain yield/fad in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm produced highest 1000 grain weight.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteria x 600 ppme0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm interaction gave the highest mean values of plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, 1000 grain weight and grain yield/fad in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm produced highest grain yield/fad.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Rhizobacteria x 600 ppme0
Outcome
grain yield/fade0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobacteria x 600 ppm interaction gave the highest mean values of plant height, spike length, number of spikes/m2, 1000 grain weight and grain yield/fad in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer and nano-silica interaction significantly affected studied traits, except first-season grain yield.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
biofertilizers x nano-silica concentratione0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Qualifier
except grain yield/fad in the first seasone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“biofertilizers x nano-silica concentration interaction exhibited a significant impact on all studied traits in both seasons, except grain yield/fad in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1250 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

silicon dioxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.