Abstract
Among the environmental stresses, drought stress is one of the most adverse factors of plant growth and productivity. This study was carried out to evaluate influence of substrate humidity on proline and soluble sugars levels in the leaves of pea. The proline and soluble sugars content did not change very much in control plants during the entire period of investigation, while in drought treated plants, proline content increased dramatically as well as soluble sugars level. Relative water content of leaves was about 64% under control condition, while the drought treatment caused a decrease in RWC to 15%. The correlation-regression analysis of our data revealed a very strong relationship between substrate water content and proline content as well as between peat water content and soluble sugar content in leaves.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf proline content increased dramatically under drought treatment relative to controls.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- droughte0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increased dramaticallye0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The proline and soluble sugars content did not change very much in control plants during the entire period of investigation, while in drought treated plants, proline content increased dramatically as well as soluble sugars level.”
t0“Pisum sativum L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf soluble sugars increased under drought treatment relative to controls.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- droughte0
- Outcome
- soluble sugars levele0
- Direction
- increased dramaticallye0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The proline and soluble sugars content did not change very much in control plants during the entire period of investigation, while in drought treated plants, proline content increased dramatically as well as soluble sugars level.”
t0“Pisum sativum L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plants showed little change in proline and soluble sugar content over the investigation.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Outcome
- proline and soluble sugars contente0
- Direction
- did not change very muche0
- Qualifier
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The proline and soluble sugars content did not change very much in control plants during the entire period of investigation, while in drought treated plants, proline content increased dramatically as well as soluble sugars level.”
t0“Pisum sativum L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced leaf relative water content to 15%, versus about 64% under control conditions.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- drought treatmente0
- Outcome
- Relative water content of leavese0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 15%e0
- Qualifier
- 64%e0
- Comparator
- control conditione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Relative water content of leaves was about 64% under control condition, while the drought treatment caused a decrease in RWC to 15%.”
t0“Pisum sativum L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Substrate water content had a very strong relationship with leaf proline content.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- substrate water contente0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Qualifier
- very strong relationshipe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The correlation-regression analysis of our data revealed a very strong relationship between substrate water content and proline content as well as between peat water content and soluble sugar content in leaves.”
t0“Pisum sativum L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Peat water content had a very strong relationship with leaf soluble sugar content.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- peat water contente0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar content in leavese0
- Qualifier
- very strong relationshipe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The correlation-regression analysis of our data revealed a very strong relationship between substrate water content and proline content as well as between peat water content and soluble sugar content in leaves.”
t0“Pisum sativum L.”
The same questions in other papers
drought · physiology: water · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.